Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Question about evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GraftMeIn" data-source="post: 257369" data-attributes="member: 2683"><p>I didn't say they couldn't, I merely asked&nbsp;why comparing two religions&nbsp;was any different than comparing two rocks, to any other two things that contain no life.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Why is it so important to you that I need to know about all these other religions? I was talking about what's written in the Bible, not what other creation stories say. I was talking about something I have read, and you want me talk about things I haven't read.</p><p></p><p>this brings us back to the two rock theory again.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>You are the one rejecting anything from the Bible, saying that it needs to be compared to all the other religions.</p><p></p><p>and like I said before....</p><p></p><p>I'm sorry I didn't&nbsp;relize that you were an expert, and had read every creation story that exists, or that you read the entire Bible, and every book about science there is, and understand each one so completely. Therefore you must be much more knowledgable than I am about any of this. I guess I should accept everything you say without question since you know so much more than I do, about all of it. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>He created light before he created the plants is what I said, Do you think the only possible source of light comes from the sun?</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I was not talking about the other creation myths, I was talking about the Bible. So why do I need to be worried about these other myths?</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Have you actually read every single creation myth out there? Are you a scientist? Excuse me if I'm wrong but I think I metioned that it is possible for science, and the Bible to support each other.</p><p></p><p>The only part I questioned was how you get life from two things that contain no life at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Actually Genesis is younger than man, doesn't take a scientist to figure that out either. It has been around much longer than most other written texts though. </p><p></p><p>As far as the greek mythology goes, it was debunked ages ago. and untill you can provide me with solid scientific proof that the Bible is wrong then I will continue to believe what it says. So far science tells me it's correct in the way it states the order of things were created.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GraftMeIn, post: 257369, member: 2683"] I didn't say they couldn't, I merely asked why comparing two religions was any different than comparing two rocks, to any other two things that contain no life. Why is it so important to you that I need to know about all these other religions? I was talking about what's written in the Bible, not what other creation stories say. I was talking about something I have read, and you want me talk about things I haven't read. this brings us back to the two rock theory again. You are the one rejecting anything from the Bible, saying that it needs to be compared to all the other religions. and like I said before.... I'm sorry I didn't relize that you were an expert, and had read every creation story that exists, or that you read the entire Bible, and every book about science there is, and understand each one so completely. Therefore you must be much more knowledgable than I am about any of this. I guess I should accept everything you say without question since you know so much more than I do, about all of it. He created light before he created the plants is what I said, Do you think the only possible source of light comes from the sun? I was not talking about the other creation myths, I was talking about the Bible. So why do I need to be worried about these other myths? Have you actually read every single creation myth out there? Are you a scientist? Excuse me if I'm wrong but I think I metioned that it is possible for science, and the Bible to support each other. The only part I questioned was how you get life from two things that contain no life at all. Actually Genesis is younger than man, doesn't take a scientist to figure that out either. It has been around much longer than most other written texts though. As far as the greek mythology goes, it was debunked ages ago. and untill you can provide me with solid scientific proof that the Bible is wrong then I will continue to believe what it says. So far science tells me it's correct in the way it states the order of things were created. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Question about evolution
Top
Bottom