Interesting that creationists have mostly ignored this thread. And by interesting I mean entirely predictable.
Perhaps this one is more your style: The Wordless BookWhen I read a book it is always best to skip every other page. That way all books are shorter and make zero sense.
Who needs books (plural) when you have the bibleBet I'm more well read than you are.
The Great Textbook Wars | American RadioWorksWhat should children learn in school? It's a question that's stirred debate for decades, and in 1974 it led to violent protests in West Virginia. Schools were hit by dynamite, buses were riddled with bullets, and coal mines were shut down. The fight was over a new set of textbooks.
I hope so!Bet I'm more well read than you are.
What books specifically?Who needs books (plural) when you have the bible?
It allows us to produce light.I hope so!
But what good is all your education without the Light?
Still a thing. But there are sub-categories...You do know that it's not officially called the "Precambrian Era" anymore, don't you?
Still a thing. But there are sub-categories...
Mine has evidence for all of it, not just some of it.I can do that too.
Mine has evidence for all of it, not just some of it.
Some go so far as to claim fossils areAnd at the end of the day, we have a fossil succession which demonstrates that all fossils are transitional and make up this larger order of fish>amphibian>reptiles>mammal/bird, and cambrian > Devonian> carboniferous > Triassic/Jurassic, with fish/amphibians of the devonian (ex. Tiktaalik), amphibian/reptile transitions in the carboniferous/permian (ex. Frogamander), reptile/mammal transitions in the permian-triassic (ex therapsids) and reptile/bird transitionals in the jurassic (ex archaeopteryx and other theropod/bird hybrids).
And then further there is a fossil succession in plants and of course other invertebrates and basically anything that can produce fossils falls within this order.
View attachment 299701
View attachment 299702
People who deny evolution or are young earth Creationists, typically just try to deny all of this information. But for those who actually study the topic, it's really not even remotely questionable. It's as simple and as well understood as concepts such as the sun being hot.
No need to try vety hard. For those withoutAnd at the end of the day, we have a fossil succession which demonstrates that all fossils are transitional and make up this larger order of fish>amphibian>reptiles>mammal/bird, and cambrian > Devonian> carboniferous > Triassic/Jurassic, with fish/amphibians of the devonian (ex. Tiktaalik), amphibian/reptile transitions in the carboniferous/permian (ex. Frogamander), reptile/mammal transitions in the permian-triassic (ex therapsids) and reptile/bird transitionals in the jurassic (ex archaeopteryx and other theropod/bird hybrids).
And then further there is a fossil succession in plants and of course other invertebrates and basically anything that can produce fossils falls within this order.
View attachment 299701
View attachment 299702
People who deny evolution or are young earth Creationists, typically just try to deny all of this information.
Or, that they all lived at the same time and and them (falsely so called "scientists") just line them up in a way to look like
a progression.
No need to try very hard.
For those without intellectual integrity, there's nothing that can't be believed,
... or made up and presented as fact.
The less education and integrity, the easier.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?