Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well if you know something about "Speciation, and the origin of novel species" of cichlids, just say so. No need to mock the rest of us who don't.In respect to the disclaimer statement made by the preposed Evolution Theory experts in the field, to that of your statement....
"people for whom the basic concepts are simply over their head. Can't help that."
It really shows that the Evolution experts who make claims and have a disclaimer of "hard to understand" emperically through mathematics, is another way of saying it is over our heads or that we know absolutely something (pun intended) about it. So go figure, pseudo scientists or should I say sciencetologists.
Well if you know something about "Speciation, and the origin of novel species" of cichlids, just say so. No need to mock the rest of us who don't.
Uh... Scientologists have nothing to do with science, despite their name. They are people that follow a sci-fi novel as their religion.In respect to the disclaimer statement made by the preposed Evolution Theory experts in the field, to that of your statement....
"people for whom the basic concepts are simply over their head. Can't help that."
It really shows that the Evolution experts who make claims and have a disclaimer of "hard to understand" emperically through mathematics, is another way of saying it is over our heads or that we know absolutely something (pun intended) about it. So go figure, pseudo scientists or should I say sciencetologists.
Evolution isn't super hard to understand, but it is difficult to explain it to people properly who were exposed to misinformation first.
Time will tell.The evolution theory collapses. With more scientific data emerging, the theory becomes untenable as an empirically viable and scientific solution to the origins of life and therefore must be rejected as nothing more than psuedo science at best, just like alchemy was in its days.
Not likely. The oldest human remains found to date are from Morocco and they're 300,000 years old. How do you reconcile that?
The creator made us perfect. We screwed up nature by sinning and letting death and destruction into nature. It's not evidence of common ancestor.I gave you the example of a broken vitanim c gene and you claim it is common design. The creator designed us with a broken vitamin c gene? That doesn't make sense.
Forget the evidence for a moment. What I would suggest starting with is understanding the scientific method. You keep claiming that evolution/common ancestry can't be tested. First you need to understand how science works, then you'll have a better baseline for understanding how things like common ancestry can and are tested.
That is where I would start: learn how hypotheses are formed and tested. Learn what "testing" and "observation" actually means (note: it doesn't mean necessarily recreating an event; it can be looking at outcomes from a past event). Then go from there.
What Is Science?
The Scientific Method
Deductive Reasoning vs. Inductive Reasoning
It claims a common ancestor and yet it was never an observed phenomenon.
It remains an assumption and all testing only shows is similarities.
Was Jesus perfect?I guess the creator didn't make us "perfect" then.
Are you a disinformation agent?The classification of the sons of God (prehistoric people) as Humans, is in error. The FIRST Humans (descendants of Adam) arrived in Lake Van, Turkey some 11,000 years ago according to the History of the FIRST Human farming on planet Earth. Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE The history of Human civilization began in the Cradle of Civilization, Northern Mesopotamia.
IOW, we did NOT evolve from the common ancestor of Apes as the False ToE assumes. Amen? Amen.
That's a conversation you'll have to have with your fellow Christians, since clearly they don't all share your opinion.
Regardless, the fact that Christians can hold their beliefs and accept the Theory of Evolution as valid science shows that the theory of Evolution is clearly not about denial of God or faith.
All depends on one’s interpretation, I guess.It is a denial of the biblical account. The Christians that don't believe the Genesis account and believe in evolution do all kinds of explaining away even though the account is confirmed throughout scripture. The explanation gymnastics is pretty amazing to watch.
It's not a denial of anything. It's an unwillingness to abandon a well-supported interpretation of the biblical account in favor of literalism. Once you take that position, no "explaining away" is required.It is a denial of the biblical account. The Christians that don't believe the Genesis account and believe in evolution do all kinds of explaining away even though the account is confirmed throughout scripture. The explanation gymnastics is pretty amazing to watch.
It’s true the first signs of civilization are dated around then; this is already known. It does not follow that because the earliest human remains found predate the earliest known civilization we did not evolve from a common ancestor with apes. That’s a complete non sequitur. Nonetheless, anotomically modern humans first showed up no later than 300,000 years ago.The classification of the sons of God (prehistoric people) as Humans, is in error. The FIRST Humans (descendants of Adam) arrived in Lake Van, Turkey some 11,000 years ago according to the History of the FIRST Human farming on planet Earth. Map: Fertile Cresent, 9000 to 4500 BCE The history of Human civilization began in the Cradle of Civilization, Northern Mesopotamia.
IOW, we did NOT evolve from the common ancestor of Apes as the False ToE assumes. Amen? Amen.
These are not fictitious terms,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?