Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
no it will not be an issue for evolution. as i showed with the tetrapod tracks- its predate its suppose ancestor by about 15-20 my. and even in this case they doesnt say that evolution is false. they just claiming for more missing fossils or convergent evolution (tetrapod evolved twice). so again: if a fossil in the correct order is evidence for evolution then a fossil in the wrong place should be evidence against it.
God is under the legal system.... good to know.
That's twisting the truth. The legal system AGREES with God because they MUST judge between good and evil and it is unfair to try the innocent.
Clearly you haven't actually read any of the passages before that one. You might want to go back and discover what man was actually "made" with, and what he took
You speak like someone who has never read the Bible. Adam was shaped, like the Master Potter molded the in the likeness of YHWH/Jesus. Adam was made to be brighter than the Noonday Sun and Adam shined with the same glory YHWH/Jesus had and he lived for billions of years with Jesus, knowing only good.
Until Adam sinned, he lived in a perfect body, like Christians will have in Heaven, for this corruption (flesh) must put on incorruption. 1Co 15:54 When we have put on incorruption, the full impact of what Jesus did for all of us, will shine like the Sun from ALL of God's children. I can hardly wait to shine. How bout you?
You also cannot bring charges against toddlers. But they are still smart and have a rudimentary understanding of right and wrong.
And yet God Himself has engaged in the wholesale killing of the innocent... He's wiped out entire cultures (and commanded his followers to do the same) down to the tiniest, most innocent child.
How about you answer the question: What was Adam punished for?
An even bigger misunderstanding is the calling of people as innocent. There are no innocent people. For ALL have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. The wages of sun are death. Our own righteousness is as filthy rags. We are born from the womb as sinners and there is none righteous no not one. So his argument is invalid.False, since all humans will leave this earth and return to our Creator. The only way for God to kill people is to separate Himself from them, forever...and He gives us a free decision to accept or reject Him. Unbelievers have rejected God's desire that they believe in Jesus, so they remain dead and subject to the darkness they have freely chosen for themselves, alone with self, for Eternity.
Amen, but they are not intelligent enough, yet, to really understand the difference between good and evil, and to bear the consequences. So, they are Juveniles. IF Godless evolution were true and mindless nature evolved our superior intelligence, we would be born knowing even more than the all knowing Evols who believe in the false religion of the ToE.
You can't show that any of that actually happened. You have no observation of it ever happening and you can not that it or reproduce it. It's all assumption.This is where a deeper understanding is needed of both biological evolution and what "transitional fossils" entail.
Evolution is NOT a strictly linear, ladder-like process. This is something which can be misconstrued due to the way diagrams of evolutionary progression are often presented. For example, that whale diagram depicts a very linear progression, but the reality isn't likely that linear at all.
The thing to remember is that evolution tends to be a branching process, whereby populations of organisms split and diverge in various paths. And the level of morphological change between different populations can vary wildly depending on specific circumstances of those individual populations.
The result is that it's possible to have a species which has transitionary features of its ancestors existing at the same time as other species that may have more morphological divergence. This is whereby transitional fossils are defined by features that link two or more taxa. It doesn't necessarily have to be a direct ancestor, and I imagine in most if not all cases, it probably isn't a direct ancestor. But rather transitional fossils are representative of evolutionary transitions based strictly on morphological features. Yet some of those transitional species may have continued to exist even well after the evolution of said morphology. After all, there is nothing requiring a transitional species suddenly go extinct if its population splits and branches off into something else.
Thus, finding an "out of order" whale fossil isn't the big issue you make it out to be when we're still within the time frame when whale evolution is thought to have occurred. If we found more modern whale fossils much earlier, by tens or hundreds of millions of years, that would be a much bigger issue.
Forum dude. Stop pretending.
Not publishing here.
This is just your lame excuse to mock someone (ad hominem attack) to draw attention from the poster original point. You are creating a red herring about copying and it seems to work as the uneducated quickly "agree" not recognizing your intent.
Explain this, please?
AV,
In #5789 you stated, 'God created the universe with age embedded into it'.
I asked for biblical evidence to support your claim. You cherry pick one verse from 2 Peter 3:5 (KJV) to support your claim.
That does this verse state in context?
3 Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires. 4 They will say, ‘Where is this “coming” he promised? Ever since our ancestors died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation.’ 5 But they deliberately forget that long ago by God’s word the heavens came into being and the earth was formed out of water and by water. 6 By these waters also the world of that time was deluged and destroyed 2 Peter 3:3-6 NIV).
Verse 5 says nothing whatsoever about God's creation in the beginning having age embedded into it.
It deals with what will happen in the last days with scoffers following evil desires.
Verse 5 states clearly that in the last days people will deliberately forget that 'long ago' the heavens and the earth came into being by God's word.
Not a word here about the universe being created with age embedded into it. What is motivating you to reach your eisegetical conclusion - your reading into the text what is not there?
Oz
False, since all humans will leave this earth and return to our Creator.
The only way for God to kill people is to separate Himself from them, forever...and He gives us a free decision to accept or reject Him.
Unbelievers have rejected God's desire that they believe in Jesus, so they remain dead and subject to the darkness they have freely chosen for themselves, alone with self, for Eternity.
Evols believe that intelligence expands within the brains of apes over time within a population. This is UnTrue since we MUST continue to train/teach our babies what we have learned.
Speaking of pretending...
How does one justify dishonest plagiarism/forum rules breaking to try to make people think that they are smarter and better informed than they actually are?
"Not publishing here. "
So, since this is not a publication (it is almost certainly going to get more public exposure than anything a supposed adjunct professor would publish), it is OK to present someone else's work as your own?
Such ethical relativism.
I do note with some laughter that once the plagiarism was exposed, the phony 'expert' scampered off, never to expand on or explain how the supposed relevance of the hack Meyer and his creationist pals was a problem for evolution.
So many creationists accept the claims of other creationists at face value despite have limited or zero relevant knowledge themselves.
They SHOULD be ashamed and embarrassed, but they are creationists.
Pathetic pretenders.
I like this response to you on the apologetics forum (they see through you over there, too):
"The irony that the OP calls himself "uber genius" and complains about people pretending to be smart should be lost on no one."
You can't show that any of that actually happened. You have no observation of it ever happening and you can not that it or reproduce it. It's all assumption.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?