Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I find that hard to believe, frankly.
Well please let me know when you can test and reproduce evolution from a common ancestor will you? I will swallow my pride and say well I guess they were right all along. So far all they have is supposition based on assumption. We have yet to show a plant can become an animal.
Kenny, you know that is not true. There is almost always an explanation. I have seen you ignore explanations time after time. Not just from me, but from other posters. For example in your latest response to sfs he had explained how evolution is "proven" in the post that you demanded he explain how evolution is proven.Because all too often, in the past there is none, and no, I don't have records to all that any more than anyone here would and I'm not going to go back and prove it. Geez. Also I guess Ive stopped talking you seriously to the point I tend to skim your post now days.
For me the question is not about who, but how.
It is not a "defense", it is an observation.
Turnabout is fair play -
Well please let me know when you can test and reproduce creation from nothing will you? I will swallow my pride and say well I guess they were right all along. So far all they have is presupposition based on Faith. We have yet to be shown how dust can become organic compounds.
It's so obviously wrong/untrue, I see it as a defensive tool.
And of course you aren't going to admit that possibility.
Sorry but you are simply wrong about "dust" becoming organic compounds. That was proven in the the 1950's with the Miller Urey experiment. At that time many creationists claimed that organic compounds, a key need for abiogenesis, could not arise naturally. They were shown to be wrong. And when the early Earth atmosphere was found to be possibly in error they ran the experiment again with different atmospheres. It kept making organic compounds.
Miller–Urey experiment - Wikipedia
I find that hard to believe, frankly.
Since you are uneducated in the sciences and refuse to learn you have no basis for calling it nonsense.
Cute, but I note that you lopped off most of the post:Did you mean to follow that with a period?
Not to you, or to anyone who is either incapable or unwilling to use simple common sense reasoning.
I can at least say, all thing that are here by other than natural means, are created
, so that is proof enough for me the rest was created as well. If that doesn't work for you and you'd rather go with "it just appeared"...have at it.
Quoting out of context is almost always dishonest, especially when the answer to your question was in the post that you edited in your quote.
Cute, but I note that you lopped off most of the post:
LOL, the "dishonest christian" claim is another tired tactic. I have to ask, do you really think I'll take that to heart and feel I've been dishonest?
How dishonest is it to claim evolution but not be able to prove it.
Of course I do.
Tell me Micky Mouse created to world, and I don't need a basis, common sense tells me it's ridiculous, but
I do offer benefit of doubt in that you may prove it. I'm still waiting for what I think is a reasonable request.
And that attempted demanding of your opponent is getting old, no matter how you choose to spin up the same drivel. I do wish you could stop using those tactics to hide the fact you cannot prove evolution.
Prove it or simply come back when you can, it'll save us all tons of time.
Well, as usual you are wrong. If it was just a defensive tool I would not offer to educate those that lack such an understanding.
And Kenny, since you are wrong an amazing number of times you should never accuse others of being wrong, at least not until you have tried to learn.
Kenny, if it was just a defensive tool I would not offer to take away that defense from me. Try to use a little logic instead of making false accusations. Technically an accusation that you cannot substantiate is a breaking of the Ninth Commandment.
What would constitute proof of evolution if not the wealth of data and evidence from the scientific literature? (I mean, one could post links to research all day and still have a long ways to go)Still waiting for that proof.
Since I am trying to use my time more wisely, can you all please do me a favor? Once you have dead proof of evolution, from start to date, please start your post with "here is dead proof of evolution".
That way, all I need do is skim or search the thread for what's on topic/the only thing that really matters here, and can skip the irrelevant.
Thanks.
That is such a shame. That only indicates that your morals need some work. You won't allow yourself to see how you are "sinning".You're about as far from making me feel guilty as you can possibly be lol, so how bout we take it all back down to topic/proving evolution is anything more than a theory, and if one cannot do that, they should probably just stay out of the conversation...fair enough..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?