• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Protestant errors and inventions (3)

Status
Not open for further replies.

MoreCoffee

Repentance works.
Jan 8, 2011
29,860
2,841
Near the flying spaghetti monster
✟65,348.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
A less convincing set of statements could hardly be imagined.

So, is that the best you can manage?

If so, your claim is dismissed as the bogus nonsense that it is.


Not many writers of either testament were holders of the Prophet's office yet Paul, Peter, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John Nehimiah's biographer, Ezra's biographer, the author of 1 & 2 Samual, 1 & 2 Kings, Proverbs, the Song of Songs, and so on managed to write under inspiration, did they not?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Rev Randy

Sometimes I pretend to be normal
Aug 14, 2012
7,410
643
Florida,USA
✟32,653.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married

So you believe the reformer were correct in removing the rest?
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,963
5,792
✟1,000,734.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married




While there is much Prophesy in the Bible, the Bible is not only Prophesy; many books are chronicles and history. Rev. Dr. Martin Luther on 1 Maccabees:

Luther felt a bit differently about 2 Maccabees but says:
But we include it anyway, for the sake of the good story of the seven Maccabean martyrs and their mother , and other things as well... However the whole thing is left and referred to the pious reader to judge and decide.

Luther's quotes taken from the American Edition of Luther's Works, 35:350-353
 
Upvote 0

MoreCoffee

Repentance works.
Jan 8, 2011
29,860
2,841
Near the flying spaghetti monster
✟65,348.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
It's not often that Josephus' works are regarded as the standard for setting the canon of sacred scripture. I cannot help but think that desperation was the motive behind quoting him. And it ought to be noted that brother Standing Up did claim that "Maccabees itself disclaims any inspiration" But failed to deliver the requested disclaimer:
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
That's right. Reformers were correct in their assessment that the Apocrypha was non-canonical.

In fact, it's not that sexy a topic at all. These books are known to everyone to have a different character than the rest of the books of the Bible, only some of the Jews of Jesus' time accepted them as Scripture (unlike the Torah, etc.), and they were in question from the time that they were included in the canon right on up to the time of the Reformation when the Roman church again addressed the issue on its own.

To talk about the "Reformers removing...." is little more than an argument for the sake of an argument or, perhaps more accurately, an argument looking for an issue.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The Orthodox include them in the canon.

The Oriental Orthodox do too.

The Ethiopian Church does too.

So, it is true that the "reformers" removed them.

See here

Yes, I guess it is possible to name a dozen churches that accept the Apocrypha and a few thousand which do not. ZZzzzz.

Everything I wrote remains correct.
 
Upvote 0
B

bbbbbbb

Guest
The Orthodox include them in the canon.

The Oriental Orthodox do too.

The Ethiopian Church does too.

So, it is true that the "reformers" removed them.

See here

The Ethiopian Church has the largest canon of all, including just about every possible book. Their canon is just as acceptable to the Catholic Church as is the Oriental Orthodox canon (which includes additional books) and the Protestant canon (which is the smallest of the bunch).
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married

That's right. MoreCoffee misinformed us by saying that all these Catholic/Orthodox churches "include them." A look at the chart on the link he provided will show the reader that these churches are far from agreeing on WHICH of the Apocryphal books is accepted by each church body.

And then there are all the Catholic/Orthodox churches that he did not mention because, one presumes, he knows that these churches that have nothing whatsoever to do with the Protestant Reformers disagree significantly between themselves, and with the churches he did name, regarding which of the Apocryphal books they accept.
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Josephus already answered your objection about the prophetic line and former books. Point remains they viewed the period from roughly Ezra to John the Baptist as uninspired writings, whereas the former books were considered divine. Again, Maccabees itself makes the same claim for itself (uninspired) and the reason for it (no valid prophetic line).

As to the NT, we agree on the 27 books, so no need for you to pretend otherwise. BTW, any idea why the sons of thunder were so named?
 
Upvote 0

MoreCoffee

Repentance works.
Jan 8, 2011
29,860
2,841
Near the flying spaghetti monster
✟65,348.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private

Not really. Jews have a smaller one. Muslims do too.
 
Upvote 0

MoreCoffee

Repentance works.
Jan 8, 2011
29,860
2,841
Near the flying spaghetti monster
✟65,348.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Yes, I guess it is possible to name a dozen churches that accept the Apocrypha and a few thousand which do not.

...
Probably 30,000 denominations and independents and non-denominations reject them because they all swallowed the same koolaide

But for all their multiplicity of names and creeds they still represent only about 25% of Christianity. The other 75% receives the 73 books that Catholics count as canonical.
 
Upvote 0

Standing Up

On and on
Sep 3, 2008
25,360
2,757
Around about
✟73,735.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Correct. The so-called two groups that each claim to be #1 and unchanged disagree on the books of the apocraphy as divine. So much for that.

So, the 66 books are correct as canon. And the reason why the two (divine vs uninspired) are differentiated has been shown. Indeed, at least one of the books says itself there were no prophets during the time to "authorize" as inspired them. The error remains theirs.
 
Upvote 0

MoreCoffee

Repentance works.
Jan 8, 2011
29,860
2,841
Near the flying spaghetti monster
✟65,348.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Muslims have an aberrant canon which includes the Qu'ran, Some would also include the Hadith. Obviously the Jews have a smaller canon, because they reject all of the New Testament.

That's right. And Protestants reject part of the canon too.

It's all a matter of cutting out the parts of the bible that one doesn't want.
 
Upvote 0

tadoflamb

no identificado
Feb 20, 2007
16,415
7,531
Diocese of Tucson
✟74,331.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The concept that the Roman Catholic Church or any ecclesiastical power is 100% inerrant is a view founded upon a doctrine of men who seek to play kingdom building.

Thank you for that. Some time ago I started a thread on the concept that no Church or denomination is 100% doctrinally correct. Problem is, if every denomination is teaching error, how do you recognize that error? For example, what is the error of your group? Furthermore, why would any sincere Christian visibly attach themselves to a denomination that they know is teaching error even if they have no mechanism to detect what that error is?

It's impossible for me to believe that God became Incarnate, lived among us, established a Church and now it's just a guessing game as to what is the fullness of His revealed Truth. No, I believe the Sacred Scriptures when they tell me that Christ's Church will be visible, it will have an authentic authority to teach and it is the pillar and foundation of all Truth.

Anything less is unacceptable.
 
Upvote 0

Tzaousios

Αυγουστινιανικός Χριστιανός
Dec 4, 2008
8,504
609
Comitatus in praesenti
Visit site
✟34,229.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Saying we believe in Christ does not make you Christ's friends just though I remind you of what is written in scripture.

Still waiting for you to address the SPECIFICS of the replies that were made to you. This is a space for discussion, not your unilateral declarations of rhetoric.
 
Upvote 0

tadoflamb

no identificado
Feb 20, 2007
16,415
7,531
Diocese of Tucson
✟74,331.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
We're going to be hearing from the Book of Wisdom this upcoming Sunday. I think you guys are really missing out. Here's the readings if you want to score along at home:

Twenty-third Sunday in Ordinary Time

It's not just the fact that books have gone missing but the books that remain have been toyed with as well. As evidence I submit Malachi 1:11 which we discussed earlier in this thread. What a Catholic bible calls a 'perfect sacrifice' an unauthorized protestant translation reads 'pure grain offering'. Aside from the attempt to mitigate the fact that the Catholic mass fulfills Malachi's prophecy, how does this translation relate to protestantism? I sort of doubt you're offering pure grain offerings east to west, sunrise to sunset.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.