Hail everyone.
My relation with God is good, and due to that i´m opened to the thruth, but I cant realize what is the correct church, in spite of i´m thinking much of this.
I´ve problems with the protestant church because they say that the Bible is the only thruth, but: what books make up the canon, what books are holy? Macabeos, Iudit, Tobías are holy in one half of the christianity, but in the other hanf they are unholy: we need an auctority who decides this subject, and it is not the Bible, because the letters of the apostles mention books are considerated by all apocrifes: by example the profecy of Enoc, and books considerated canonical by all are not mentioned in the new testament: by example Job or Esther. Christ says to Peter "when you get strengthened, you confirm your brothers": we need one man who have the authority to resolve the subject, and this man only can be the Peter succesor.
In the other hand I´ve problems with the Catholicism due to the worship to the saints; especially when it acts through images, statues or dolls; the second commandement forbid the worship to criature; I know that the saints are members of Christ, so pray to saints is pray to Christ in his body, but it involves an artificial intention: when people have devotion with a saint at the end develops a partial idolatrie, believes that if he dont pray to the saint its sanity will be damned: thats my experience.
Due to this, in catholics nations, like Spain, there´s a legacy of idolatrie that impregnate sport, nacionalism and policies. The catholic worship a lot of times are made up of "avemarías" of the rosary, not many times the relation with God is face to face.
So I see the Catholic Church is solid according to the idea of Peter, but its fruits are rotten; the protestant Church contradicts itself, arguing that the Bible is the only thruth, but having not the authority to set up the canon of the holy books.
Thats my crossroad, what do u think?
My relation with God is good, and due to that i´m opened to the thruth, but I cant realize what is the correct church, in spite of i´m thinking much of this.
I´ve problems with the protestant church because they say that the Bible is the only thruth, but: what books make up the canon, what books are holy? Macabeos, Iudit, Tobías are holy in one half of the christianity, but in the other hanf they are unholy: we need an auctority who decides this subject, and it is not the Bible, because the letters of the apostles mention books are considerated by all apocrifes: by example the profecy of Enoc, and books considerated canonical by all are not mentioned in the new testament: by example Job or Esther. Christ says to Peter "when you get strengthened, you confirm your brothers": we need one man who have the authority to resolve the subject, and this man only can be the Peter succesor.
In the other hand I´ve problems with the Catholicism due to the worship to the saints; especially when it acts through images, statues or dolls; the second commandement forbid the worship to criature; I know that the saints are members of Christ, so pray to saints is pray to Christ in his body, but it involves an artificial intention: when people have devotion with a saint at the end develops a partial idolatrie, believes that if he dont pray to the saint its sanity will be damned: thats my experience.
Due to this, in catholics nations, like Spain, there´s a legacy of idolatrie that impregnate sport, nacionalism and policies. The catholic worship a lot of times are made up of "avemarías" of the rosary, not many times the relation with God is face to face.
So I see the Catholic Church is solid according to the idea of Peter, but its fruits are rotten; the protestant Church contradicts itself, arguing that the Bible is the only thruth, but having not the authority to set up the canon of the holy books.
Thats my crossroad, what do u think?
