- Mar 5, 2004
- 17,332
- 6,439
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Perhaps the Bible is taught at her church, just not your interpretation of it.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I noticed you overlooked all the Scripture I gave. But I guess that's because the Bible isn't taught at your church. That explains everything.
Perhaps he hasnt interpreted it at all but just cited and quoted it, perhaps they simply dont believe the Bible ate her church. All evidence shows the latter.Perhaps the Bible is taught at her church, just not your interpretation of it.
the Bible ate her church.
brightmorningstar said:the Bible ate her church.
Sounds like the sequel to "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes". Where's it showing?
Sounds like the sequel to "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes". Where's it showing?
Sounds like the sequel to "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes". Where's it showing?
This is my first vist to the thread, and because it's much to large to plow through I haven't bothered to read it all, so please forgive me if this has been posted before.
Public opinion on California Proposition 8 (2008)
.....................for....against...undecided
23 May 2008 ...54%.... 35%.......11%
28 May 2008 ...42%.....51%........ 7%
17 July 2008.... 42%.... 51%........ 7%
27 Aug 2008.... 40%.....54%........ 6%
14 Sep 2008.... 38%.....55%........ 7%
source
Sounds like the sequel to "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes". Where's it showing?
Bump, for Texas Lynn to answer the Scripture in post #359
My friend......you're bordering on misquoting me again.Dogbean, I just went back and had a look at post 359...
What exactly in either of the cited Bible verses makes you think that civil adoption has anything to do with your version of Christianity?
Should Hindu couples not be allowed to adopt? Atheist couples?
Seems to me we're targeting homosexuals for discrimnation and trying to justify it after the fact again. If your concern was REALLY about the "Christian" upbringing of adoptees, you'd want to make it illegal for anyone who isn't your particular brand of Christian to adopt... yet its just homosexuals you have a problem with. Curious...
Quoting Sarah Palin?????
You hit that nail right on the head. If you are going to advocate discrimination then it should apply to allDogbean, I just went back and had a look at post 359...
What exactly in either of the cited Bible verses makes you think that civil adoption has anything to do with your version of Christianity?
Should Hindu couples not be allowed to adopt? Atheist couples?
Seems to me we're targeting homosexuals for discrimnation and trying to justify it after the fact again. If your concern was REALLY about the "Christian" upbringing of adoptees, you'd want to make it illegal for anyone who isn't your particular brand of Christian to adopt... yet its just homosexuals you have a problem with. Curious...
Here's a statement in opposition to Prop 8 from a conservative business group, Valley Industry and Commerce Association (VICA):
The board of the Valley Industry and Commerce Association (VICA) voted overwhelming today to oppose Proposition 8, the constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, citing its potential impact on business and the economy. "VICA carefully considered the consequences of passing Prop. 8 and discovered that its passage could result in the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in business revenue," said VICA Chairman Greg Lippe. "In the current economic conditions, it is necessary to keep all potential revenue streams flowing."The board of the Valley Industry and Commerce Association (VICA) voted overwhelming today to oppose Proposition 8, the constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, citing its potential impact on business and the economy. "VICA carefully considered the consequences of passing Prop. 8 and discovered that its passage could result in the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in business revenue," said VICA Chairman Greg Lippe. "In the current economic conditions, it is necessary to keep all potential revenue streams flowing."
The members of the VICA board also noted that current labor laws regarding domestic partnerships increase administration costs and liability for organizations. Allowing the choice of marriage to be available to all couples has the potential to simplify the benefits process for employers. "Domestic partnership rules increase paperwork and create extra steps in the human resources process," said VICA President Stuart Waldman. "VICA has a history of working to make labor laws less onerous for employers, and our opposition to Prop. 8 is consistent with that stance."
Because married homosexuals don't shop? Or what?VICA carefully considered the consequences of passing Prop. 8 and discovered that its passage could result in the loss of hundreds of millions of dollars in business revenue
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?