Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's old because it's actually old. Not because it was made to look that way.
Which is all anyone ever proposed.
No, they trust in their fallible interpretation of what he said and taught, and they do so regardless of any and all evidence to the contrary.
You are mixing in man's assumptions with your beliefs.
Why are those Christians conservative? Because they trust what Jesus
said and taught. That Genesis is a true account of our history.
The one that resulted in the global flood in Genesis 1.
[FONT="][FONT="]D[/FONT]arkness covered the deep waters. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters.[/FONT] [FONT="]Then God said, Let there be light, and the rest is history.[/FONT]
There is no real evidence to the contrary. Only different conclusions. Do
you think people are looking at different evidence?
And evolution proposes a lot of things not evident. You just gave a few
examples with snake, turtle and frog so called evolution, which are a
lot of assumptions and little evidence.
Actually, science tells us it was cold before it started to become warm around 11 thousand years ago, shortly before God began His new creation.I see nothing about anything being cold.
Another great example of christians inserting their own words into the Bible.
Actually, science tells us it was cold before it started to become warm around 11 thousand years ago, shortly before God began His new creation.
The best theories are the ones that are able to reconcile biblical history with scientific discoveries.Where does science say anything aboug God doing anything? Where does the Bible talk about an ice age?
You are making stuff up on both fronts.
The best theories are the ones that are able to reconcile biblical history with scientific discoveries.
Science gives us an idea of when the Holocene Epoch began (around 11,000 years ago at the end of the last glacial period), which was shortly before the creation events in Genesis 1 began around 6,000 years ago. This explains why the earth was flooded in Genesis 1. It was from the melting glaciers. It all fits nicely.
Not all conclusions are equal, ED. Hollow Earthers are looking at the same evidenc, too. That doesn't mean their conclusions hold as much weight as the actual scientists. You and your lunatic fringe are no different, despite how much you might like to think you are.
No, I gave you predictions made by evolution. In each case, they were things that evolution required to exist and were expected to be found in the fossil record if we found anything at all. How can an invalid theory make predictions that turn out to be true? Coincidence?
Are you calling me a lunatic because I trust God's word and Jesus and
have different conclusions to the evidence?
If I predicted that God created kinds with complexity that diversified
into lesser creatures like the frogamander into frogs and slamanders
then what would I find? Exact evidence for that prediction.
The best theories are the ones that are able to reconcile biblical history with scientific discoveries.
Science gives us an idea of when the Holocene Epoch began (around 11,000 years ago at the end of the last glacial period), which was shortly before the creation events in Genesis 1 began around 6,000 years ago.
This explains why the earth was flooded in Genesis 1. It was from the melting glaciers. It all fits nicely.
The bible and Gods creation was never meant to be a science lesson. But through the ages man has taken the position of trying to play God and explain everything. This is something within us because we want to know everything. But we can never understand how God created things and how he works. If you look back at history you will see that people have made all sorts of predictions and have had stupid explanations about this world and how things work. This hasn't been just religion but many scientific ideas were also crazy and ridiculous. Thats because we just didn't have the knowledge. We still dont but now we are getting closer to the very core of existence."First, . . . to want to affirm that in reality the sun is at the center of the world and only turns on itself without moving from east to west, and the earth . . . revolves with great speed about the sun . . . is a very dangerous thing, likely not only to irritate all scholastic philosophers and theologians, but also to harm the Holy Faith by rendering Holy Scripture false."--Cardinal Bellarmine, 1615
Any theory about history must take into account the records of history.Why do theories need to change in order to match stories in books?
Scientific discoveries are always confirming God's historical record whenever the science is done right.I am still waiting for the science that says God created anything.
The biblical record remains the same. Scientific discoveries gives support to that record.Funny how no one said that until after the discovery of glaciers. The interpretation of the Bible is what keeps changing.
Are you calling me a lunatic because I trust God's word and Jesus and
have different conclusions to the evidence?
If I predicted that God created kinds with complexity that diversified
into lesser creatures like the frogamander into frogs and slamanders
then what would I find? Exact evidence for that prediction.
That was well before the flood of Noah... before there was even a Garden of Eden... you're not making any sense now.The one that resulted in the global flood in Genesis 1.
[FONT="][FONT="]D[/FONT]arkness covered the deep waters. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters.[/FONT] [FONT="]Then God said, Let there be light, and the rest is history.[/FONT]
Your conclusions have nothing to do with the evidence, which makes it lunacy. Also, you are referencing the words of men.
Why would you predict frogamanders but not mammal-birds? Why would your predictions exactly match what we would expect from common ancestry and evolution?
God obviously made fowl separate from beasts of the earth and creeping
things and man and whales and fish. So why would we predict a mammal-
bird?
Any theory about history must take into account the records of history.
Scientific discoveries are always confirming God's historical record whenever the science is done right.
The biblical record remains the same. Scientific discoveries gives support to that record.
Then why do we find fossils with a mixture of features from dinosaurs and birds? Why do we find fossils with a mixture of ape and human features? Why do we find fossils with a mixture of whale and land mammal features? Why do we find fossils with a mixture of fish and terrestrial tetrapod features?
We find the very things you claim shouldn't exist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?