Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Proof against abiogenesis/evolution -- affirmative proof of God
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wiccan_Child" data-source="post: 47819487" data-attributes="member: 104966"><p>No. The Second Law of Thermodynamics <em>is</em> that equation. To say anything else is to describe something completely different.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It's called mathematical precision. If you can't understand the equation, then why are your harping on about the second law?</p><p></p><p></p><p>But since you don't even know what the second law <em>is</em>, your on very shaky grounds. Is this really how they taught you to argue your case in lawyer school?</p><p></p><p></p><p>But this has nothing to do with anyone's religious beliefs: you're just <em>wrong</em>. We're not throwing around baseless insults, it's just that you are <em>wrong, </em>categorically and unequivocably. There's no other way to put it, I'm afraid.</p><p></p><p>There is no universal law of decay, there is only the Second Law. You can't argue a conclusion derived from a false premise. Did they teach you this much in lawyer school?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wiccan_Child, post: 47819487, member: 104966"] No. The Second Law of Thermodynamics [I]is[/I] that equation. To say anything else is to describe something completely different. It's called mathematical precision. If you can't understand the equation, then why are your harping on about the second law? But since you don't even know what the second law [I]is[/I], your on very shaky grounds. Is this really how they taught you to argue your case in lawyer school? But this has nothing to do with anyone's religious beliefs: you're just [I]wrong[/I]. We're not throwing around baseless insults, it's just that you are [I]wrong, [/I]categorically and unequivocably. There's no other way to put it, I'm afraid. There is no universal law of decay, there is only the Second Law. You can't argue a conclusion derived from a false premise. Did they teach you this much in lawyer school? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Proof against abiogenesis/evolution -- affirmative proof of God
Top
Bottom