Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
problems with macroevolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sanguis" data-source="post: 53581378" data-attributes="member: 252991"><p>That's a pretty good way of putting it.</p><p></p><p>I like to say something along the lines of if one car travels at 30mph for 3 hours, it travels 90 miles.</p><p></p><p>If another car travels 30 mph for 5 hours, it travels 150 miles.</p><p></p><p>Macroevolution and micro evolution is like saying the first car traveled microdistance and the second one traveled macrodistance. It's pointless, the only difference is timescale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sanguis, post: 53581378, member: 252991"] That's a pretty good way of putting it. I like to say something along the lines of if one car travels at 30mph for 3 hours, it travels 90 miles. If another car travels 30 mph for 5 hours, it travels 150 miles. Macroevolution and micro evolution is like saying the first car traveled microdistance and the second one traveled macrodistance. It's pointless, the only difference is timescale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
problems with macroevolution
Top
Bottom