TagliatelliMonster
Well-Known Member
I predict the answer will be that we really aren't doing any such thing that it is just NASA lying to us.
EDIT: hahaha, it didn't even last 2 posts after that one:
I'm such a prophet...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You are joking. I just know you are joking. How do we get satellites in orbit, how do we send probes to Mars, how do we send probes to Jupiter, how did we get men to the Moon, if all our calculations were done on the basis of an erroneous theory of gravity?
NASA lies and Photoshop skills and Stanley Kubrick lunar models and light filming skills.
Back in our days it was called trick photography.
See if you can find a quote from George Coyne where he denies goecentrism.
JM
Read up on Jack Parsons the occultist, and his dealings with Jet Propulsion Labs. NASA were founded by wizards, and continue to be run by such, in the true sense of the word.I think he's suggesting the images of the Earth we see are enhanced by CGI, photoshop etc. I think it would be more surprising if it wasn't.
Read up on Jack Parsons the occultist, and his dealings with Jet Propulsion Labs. NASA were founded by wizards, and continue to be run by such, in the true sense of the word.
It's not, track the planes.
Use real-time technology. In this area of research for FE there have been numerous reports of glitches reporting high air speeds above 1000Mph
If the planes have been geared for these flights to Handel high air speeds then it adds further evidence.
This is where I'm at re Flight paths,
The jet streams created by Antarctic, as a circular edge, not a continent on a globe.
Have you ever been on QF63? I've done it a couple of times, one time going far enough south that we could see the Antarctic ice shelf. That is a nonsensically long route to take on your flat earth but a sensible one to take on a global earth. Knowing that airlines live and die on fuel costs, how do you explain the willingness of Qantas to burn these ridiculous amounts of fuel to the detriment of profits in order to keep the conspiracy going? Let me guess - everyone in the world is a Freemason except for the Flat Earthers, right?
how do you explain the willingness of Qantas to burn these ridiculous amounts of fuel to the detriment of profits in order to keep the conspiracy going? Let me guess - everyone in the world is a Freemason except for the Flat Earthers, right?
Read up on Jack Parsons the occultist, and his dealings with Jet Propulsion Labs. NASA were founded by wizards, and continue to be run by such, in the true sense of the word.
Read up on Jack Parsons the occultist, and his dealings with Jet Propulsion Labs. NASA were founded by wizards, and continue to be run by such, in the true sense of the word.
WT4LW??? Wizards? Seriously?
Who do you think runs NASA? This dude?
-_- different satellites taking the pictures (no two satellites are exactly the same distance away, or they risk crashing into each other) , satellites move in elliptical orbits so they aren't a consistent distance away from the subject, taking the images using zoom functions... lots of reasons. It'd be more suspicious if all satellite photos looked exactly the same.Why all the NASA photos of Earth of various sizes, if satellites, as NASA portrays, actually exist?
-_- like I said, satellites move in elliptical orbits (an oval) so they aren't a consistent distance away at all times. So even if all of these photos had been taken by the exact same satellite, it shouldn't be shocking that there is some difference. Not only that, but the various steps in processing the photos that can result in resizing them.Do some research and you'll see the size of the Earth as shown by NASA, varied on average several times per decade since the 50's.
Moving stars (as well as exploding ones) have been observed for centuries; long before NASA. The first supernova recorded in documents that survived to this day are from 185 AD.Moving stars have never been proven the same thing as the objects launched by NASA and the other lying "space" agencies.
Seems like a clever man who had an interest in the occult. I fail to see why you think NASA is run by wizards though.
-_- the sun gives off tons of harmful radiation. Lots of it scatters, hitting matter that is between us and the sun, gets blocked by our atmosphere... and even after all that, an easily measurable amount gets through (source of sunburns). The reason you'd be affected by a hydrogen bomb more than the sun is due to proximity.You must realise that a hydrogen bomb is not quite the same as the sun, though, right? To wake up with the sun's rays coming through your bedroom window - pleasant. Radiation from a hydrogen bomb - not so much.
Wizards are real now, but astronauts aren't.
In Bizzaro World all is possible! Dog mean cat, cat mean dog! Me Bizzaro scientist, so me know.
-CryptoLutheran
Gandalf. With a little help from Sam Gamgee, of course.
Well, I have to admit to having had my fair share of hallucinogenic plants and hallucinogenic conscious states - as a young explorer of the inner and outer worlds; but I don't really see how they're relevant - unless you mean that some people mistake them for viable alternate realities or some such nonsense?Here is something you guys don't consider:
The use of hallucinogenic plants and hallucinogenic conscious states.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?