- Oct 6, 2015
- 2,324
- 791
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
What Really Happened Between John Calvin and Michael Servetus
When I first told a pastor friend of mine that I started a twitter account dedicated to the Reformer’s words, the first thing he said was, “You mean the guy who burned people at the stake?”
This was coming from an elder.
How much more would the average Christian layperson accuse Calvin unjustly?
When people think about Calvin burning people at the stake, the person that usually comes to mind is Michael Servetus. I won’t go into full details (If you want,
So, this Michael Servetus guy. He was born the same year as Calvin. Born of Spanish notability, he was utterly brilliant, and had experience in astronomy, medicine, mathematics, and theology. Had he not gone Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs, he probably would shine in our minds as a prominent figure of the renaissance era.
Instead, we’ll forever remember him as a heretic.
Where things started to go wrong was in 1531, when Servetus released a book called, On the Errors of The Trinity, in which he maligns traditional, orthodox Christianity for having embraced the Trinitarian understanding of God – that is, One God in three distinct persons; equal in divinity, but distinct in ministry. Servetus did not hold the traditional Christian position. A few years later, Servetus began to write Calvin letters. Again: Michael Servetus is the one who started this whole thing.
Servetus wrote to Calvin. And Calvin wrote back. This happened repeatedly for many years as they debated and discussed various theological matters. At first, Servetus’ tone was respectable, as if he wrote general inquiries. He seemed interested in learning from Calvin. Over time, however, Servetus became accusatory, cutting, and dismissive of Calvin. And at some point, Calvin stopped writing back.
In 1553, Servetus published another work. This book had two purposes: to further attack the doctrine of the Trinity, and personally slander the character of John Calvin. Problem is, Servetus is in France, and France is a catholic country. And at that time, open heresy was against the law (both in Geneva, Protestant communities, in Catholic communities, and all over). When authorities found out about the book, Servetus was charged and arrested for open heresy. Hersey was a crime, and if you break the law, you pay the price – burning at the stake, the standard punishment at the time.
They tried Servetus and eventually sentenced him to be burned at the stake. So now Servetus is in jail, waiting to be burned. The governing authorities were so mad at him that they demanded he should be burned slowly. There he was in jail, with no lively prospect of escape. John Calvin actually opposed people being burned at the stake. In fact, he even wrote a letter to the city council begging them not to burn Servetus.
Let me be clear: Calvin proposed that Servetus be executed by the sword but was opposing that he be burned at the stake. What did the city council say to Calvin? The city council said no, and they burned Servetus at the sake. Calvin did not burn Michael Servetus at the stake. It was not Calvin’s fault at all.
In fact, Calvin & Servetus grew up together. Calvin bumps heads with the government at that time, about execution for heresy. Calvin suggested that not everyone needed to be executed for heresy, each case should be review independently. Calvin was cast out of Geneva early in His office for disagreeing with the governing council at that time. Calvin was not allowed in the proceedings of Servetus. Because Servetus up-set the Catholic Church with such vehement. They were going to make an example out of him! They requested that he burnt slow. Calvin of no value could save Servetus. Calvin even went to visit his old friend in jail, to have him recant his beliefs, so that he would live. But Servetus was having none of it.
Calvin even warned Servetus not to come to Geneva because Calvin could not grant him safety, because of his shaky ground with the governing council. But stubborn Servetus for whatever reason (maybe a death wish) went to Geneva, where he was spotted, of all places, in the front row in Calvin's church heckling him! He was immediately arrested.
Anyway, when Calvin knew that he could not make any headway with the governing council. Calvin suggested to the council to execute Servetus by Sword, because it would be quick and painless. Instead of being roasted slowing by fire. Calvin was trying to spare his friend long suffering. Calvin even wrote about this event in his book.
So, that’s it. That’s what happened.
Sure, Calvin had many faults. You can say he was an arrogant man. You can say he was short with his critics. You can also make fun of him for being shy and awkward. All of these things are true. But you can’t say that Calvin had Michael Servetus burned at the stake, because that simply didn’t happen.
Last edited:
Upvote
0