Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You are mistaken.Reformed theology requires God forcing people to do what they do not want to do or worse, manipulates them from the inside making them want what Calvinism says God decided for them. It is tyranny of the mind and heart.
And predestination and election as the Calvinist sees it eliminates entirely the free choices made by men. There is no other logical way to see it. Now what some do is commit intellectual suicide and jettison reason. They just say it doesn't thinking saying so makes it so. Everyone including athesists see thru this smoke easily.
Since for the Calvinist "God is sovereign" means He gets his will done including making those who are chosen to be saved believe
In your teaching faith does not come by hearing...
It comes by God choosing to save a particular person.
I have. That correction is in the WCF.When I state something that you feel is incorrect, it is incumbent upon YOU to correct me.
That is correct.You say God predestines all things. So God predestines rape, murder, war, cancer.....
Mine too.My God is a loving and merciful and just God.
Read the WCF on the subject of predestination and believe it and you will not believe that God is the direct cause all things.If I thought HE caused all of the above, I'd stop worshipping Him immediately, if not sooner.
Thanks for repeating the question. The answer depends upon what one means by the question. Let's see what you are asking.LOL
I'll repeat it, but there's no answer!
If God is all-good and omnipotent...
Why does evil exist?
There is no evil in God.IOW, is there some evil in God?
Not sure what you mean by "evil" here but God will not remove evil by tyranny or force. That is because doing so is evil itself. So he is able to remove evil from the universe as men choose to love good and reject evil. It is a mistake to think He is unable. He is unwilling to by a tyrant.Is He not able to remove evil from the universe?
I am afraid I disagree. The answer is relatively simply but one needs to know what the question really means. Is it asking why there is moral evil? The answer is because men and angels chose to do evil. If it is asking why suffering occurs, that is a different question. Suffering is not necessarily moral evil.It IS a problem within Christianity and the one question for which there is no answer.
He was struggling with personal suffering, not moral evil. He ought not to have been surprised that people die. It is not really news to anyone beyond the age of young children. Why it happened to him is a different question.Good ole' Augustine thought he had the answer in his new Christian days. But, as usual with him, he did change his mind later on in life and deided that, indeed, there was no answer to this problem.
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL
One question preoccupied Augustine from the time he was a student in Carthage: why does evil exist in the world? He returned to this question again and again in his philosophy, a line of inquiry motivated by personal experience. Augustine lived in an era when the pillar of strength and stability, the Roman Empire, was being shattered, and his own life, too, was filled with turmoil and loss. First he lost his mistress, then his mother, and finally his son. To believe in God, he had to find an answer to why, if God is all-powerful and also purely good, he still allows suffering to exist.
He did not invent this one. It was communicated to Adam and Eve in the garden and down through the geneartoins of men. So this was not his answer per se. It is the answer the Bible gives. Men were given a choice between good and evil and some choose evil. Augusting did not invent this idea. The idea of sin nature was invented by Augusting, that is true.Augustine’s answers to this question would forever change Western thought. First, he states that evil exists because we have free will. God enables humans to freely choose their actions and deeds, and evil inevitably results from these choices.
I do not doubt your above presentation of the thought of Augusting. Too bad he did not focus on knowing God because he would have understood the mind of God. There are many who have and still do. If he had understood the mind of God, he would not have written as he did.Even natural evils, such as disease, are indirectly related to human action, since they become evil only when in contact with people. According to this theory, a disease spreads only because men and women put themselves in harm’s way. Augustine gave a more theological explanation later in his life: we cannot understand the mind of God, and what appears evil to us may not be evil at all. In other words, we cannot judge God’s judgment. The roots of both of these answers stemmed from two philosophies, Manicheanism and Neoplatonism, which shaped Augustine’s ideas.
I think his answer is weak and lacks understanding outside of what he said that was already said in Genesis. But that was not his answer.Is God the author of evil or its helpless victim? St. Augustine's answer has been the most intellectually credible and emotionally satisfying solution to this vexing problem.
As I said, if he had understood and known God, he would have had his answers. But if a man does not know God, then a lot of things will remain a mystery.One doesn't need a Ph.D. in theology to look around the world and realize something is desperately wrong. The existence of evil is o ne of the most vexing challenges a Christian--or any person, for that matter-- must grapple with. It's occupied the minds of great Christian thinkers since the beginning, including St. Augustine (354-430). For much of his life he worked hard at a solution.
Calvin attributed a great deal of moral evil to God and had no problem doing so. God did not create evil same as God did not create moral good. One can read in Genesis what God was credited with creating and moral evil and good are not listed. Not on a single day.This is more complete and also mentions John Calvin at the end of the article and how he accepts that God created evil.
This is an example of shutting down the mind. Simply quote a bible verse hoping no one will actually read them and the surrounding texts. If you quoted the words themselves, we would easily see through it.Romans 9:22. 1 Peter 2:8.
Not at all. No mature person thinks being locked in a room of toys where you think you can never get out a good thing. No one. Find a better illustration.Now you're just saying silly things in order to avoid the implications of the illustration.
Is sin the problem or is unforgiven sin the problem?LOL
I'll repeat it, but there's no answer!
If God is all-good and omnipotent...
Why does evil exist?
IOW, is there some evil in God?
Is He not able to remove evil from the universe?
It IS a problem within Christianity and the one question for which there is no answer.
Good ole' Augustine thought he had the answer in his new Christian days. But, as usual with him, he did change his mind later on in life and deided that, indeed, there was no answer to this problem.
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL
One question preoccupied Augustine from the time he was a student in Carthage: why does evil exist in the world? He returned to this question again and again in his philosophy, a line of inquiry motivated by personal experience. Augustine lived in an era when the pillar of strength and stability, the Roman Empire, was being shattered, and his own life, too, was filled with turmoil and loss. First he lost his mistress, then his mother, and finally his son. To believe in God, he had to find an answer to why, if God is all-powerful and also purely good, he still allows suffering to exist.
Augustine’s answers to this question would forever change Western thought. First, he states that evil exists because we have free will. God enables humans to freely choose their actions and deeds, and evil inevitably results from these choices. Even natural evils, such as disease, are indirectly related to human action, since they become evil only when in contact with people. According to this theory, a disease spreads only because men and women put themselves in harm’s way. Augustine gave a more theological explanation later in his life: we cannot understand the mind of God, and what appears evil to us may not be evil at all. In other words, we cannot judge God’s judgment. The roots of both of these answers stemmed from two philosophies, Manicheanism and Neoplatonism, which shaped Augustine’s ideas.
source: SparkNotes: Saint Augustine (A.D. 354–430): Themes, Arguments, and Ideas
Is God the author of evil or its helpless victim? St. Augustine's answer has been the most intellectually credible and emotionally satisfying solution to this vexing problem.
One doesn't need a Ph.D. in theology to look around the world and realize something is desperately wrong. The existence of evil is one of the most vexing challenges a Christian--or any person, for that matter-- must grapple with. It's occupied the minds of great Christian thinkers since the beginning, including St. Augustine (354-430). For much of his life he worked hard at a solution.
source: Augustine on Evil | Stand to Reason
This is more complete and also mentions John Calvin at the end of the article and how he accepts that God created evil.
Augustinian theodicy - Wikipedia
And this speaks of how he changed his mìnd on the millenium, but it's not the only concept.
Why Saint Augustine Changed His Mind About the Millennium
They define the words "total depravity" differently so as to avoid all problems with the theology. I mean we can look up what depravity means and it is NOT what it means to a Calvinist if you ask them about the absurdity of the doctrine. Anyone who has dealt with Mormons and JWs knows the experience. They change the meaning of the words IN CASE you see the falseness of the doctrine. "Total" does all and "depravity" does not mean depraved of all moral values. It is bait and switch. Redefining words if you care to ask. This is what the theology does to the minds of men.Here is a question for the group regarding total depravity. If we are incapable of anything but sin before we come to God, why are there nonbelievers who lead moral lives and do lots of good things, who love their families and fellow men, who treat people better than a lot of “Christians” do? Is that a totally depraved soul?
They also believe that those who want to go do so because God chose them before the foundation of the world to want to do so and cannot not want to do so. Those who go to hell are predestined to not want to go to Heaven and they cannot ever want to go to Heaven because God is preventing it.But Calvinism also believes that people do what they want to do. Those who go to Hell go there because they want to sin.
IF you are a calvinist, which is the point of the thread, He is going to save them no matter what. So preaching is just an optional extra. He (for the calvinist) already predestined them for heaven and they cannot miss no matter what they do or believe.)And God saves them by having us preach the gospel to them.
Indeed. Every time I carry one of their false tenets through to its logical (and usually absurd) end as I did here, the definition morphs into something slightly different, so one can never pin down the line of thought with certainty. It's an infinite loop of illogical reasoning.They define the words "total depravity" differently so as to avoid all problems with the theology. I mean we can look up what depravity means and it is NOT what it means to a Calvinist if you ask them about the absurdity of the doctrine. Anyone who has dealt with Mormons and JWs knows the experience. They change the meaning of the words IN CASE you see the falseness of the doctrine. "Total" does all and "depravity" does not mean depraved of all moral values. It is bait and switch. Redefining words if you care to ask. This is what the theology does to the minds of men.
So do you admit that that new creation he made who will respond favorably to the gospel and actually in truth reject the gospel despite God making him/her to respond favorably to the Gospel? You realize you have a problem here, right? If the person cannot but respond favorably to the Gospel, it really does force them to do so despite you denying it. If you admit that such a creature can reject the gospel despite God making them so, you have abandoned Calvinism.If God chooses to make a new creation who will respond favorably to the gospel - it does not force that new creation to do so or force the old creation to not do so.
Can the one in the sentence out right refuse in the end? If not, they are being controlled.No - no one's will is being controlled - only reinforced.
This is the typical change the subject of the calvinist all the while having no problem with attributing evil to God. Reject God and He will harden your heart such that you CAN NEVER repent and accept Him for some to the shame of amazing cruelty.God hardens a heart which rejects Him and gives a new heart which will accept Him to some to the praise of His amazing grace.
Willing to live with attributing evil to God but not calling it evil and using a fair amount of incompatible double talk. There is a theology that is so much better it boggles the mind how this is accepted.Now you know the answer as to how these things can be so. I glad I had the opportunity to contribute to your understanding.
Very astute. My experience is that there are two kinds of Calvinists. The majority are kind and do not like the picture of God painted by the theology and they themselves are warm and loving and caring people and so have to shut down their minds in order to remain kind and still a Calvinist. The minority become like Calvin himself and do not care if God predestines some for hell as long as they themselves are going to heaven. The do not care if the god described is cruel and unjust. They have their own assurance of Heaven at stake and therefore cannot abandon the theology. I fear for what they will face when they see him and realize what their minds called Him. Then there are those who believed them and thought they too were destined for heaven no matter what they did to others in pursuit of their own interests. (That element is not a part of this discussion.)Indeed. Every time I carry one of their false tenets through to its logical (and usually absurd) end as I did here, the definition morphs into something slightly different, so one can never pin down the line of thought with certainty. It's an infinite loop of illogical reasoning.
The text means what it says. You’re an example of one who deflects from dealing with what it says by insulting the character of the messenger. But coming from someone who believes God owes sinful man mercy, proves that 1 Peter 2:8 fits you well. Pelagius and many like him made the same arguments and rants you are making. It is why they were deemed heretics and enemies of the gospelThis is an example of shutting down the mind. Simply quote a bible verse hoping no one will actually read them and the surrounding texts. If you quoted the words themselves, we would easily see through it.
If you do not have the confidence to cut and paste the text, then it is useless to post with you. The text very likely means something different than you think it does but it is risky to quote it to others. Quote the whole bit if you want to talk about the Bible. I am only glad that we are anonymous here and no Calvinist has the power to execute those who do not accept calvinism anymore. Whew! The same attitude is seen though. "Believe in calvinism or you are a heretic and an enemy of the gospel." Thank the Lord the "we execute heretics and enemies of the gospel" has been made illegal.The text means what it says. You’re an example of one who deflects from dealing with what it says by insulting the character of the messenger. But coming from someone who believes God owes sinful man mercy, proves that 1 Peter 2:8 fits you well. Pelagius and many like him made the same arguments and rants you are making. It is why they were deemed heretics and enemies of the gospel
Je ne sai pas since anyway they will only listen if God MAKES them listen...And God saves them by having us preach the gospel to them.
It means what says quit deflecting. Power to execute lol! No, not like your forefathers the papistIf you do not have the confidence to cut and paste the text, then it is useless to post with you. The text very likely means something different than you think it does but it is risky to quote it to others. Quote the whole bit if you want to talk about the Bible. I am only glad that we are anonymous here and no Calvinist has the power to execute those who do not accept calvinism anymore. Whew! The same attitude is seen though. "Believe in calvinism or you are a heretic and an enemy of the gospel." Thank the Lord the "we execute heretics and enemies of the gospel" has been made illegal.
Preaching the Gospel is harmless compared to Calvin making sure his enemies in Geneva were burned at the stake.Je ne sai pas since anyway they will only listen if God MAKES them listen...
All seems like a waste of time to me.
God is sovereign, He could figure out some other way to save them instead of making YOU go through all the trouble.
Oh. Wait. That's right. This is what CALVIN said to do.
Whatever Calvin says, goes.
John 3:16
Acts 16:30-31
OK, MDC, time to move on. There are others I would rather talk to. I do not deal with those who do not have the kindness nor honesty to actually cut and paste the verse they claim supports their position. Too many times it just didn't and I thought the poster hoped no one would actually look it up. Not saying you do this but it has been the case in the past of others.It means what says quit deflecting. Power to execute lol! No, not like your forefathers the papist
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?