Please Read This Artical http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=articles&specific=49 and tell me what is wrong with it
That isn't probablitly. My mother and my father would have met someone, they just ended up meeting each other. If my father didn't meet my mother then he would have probably met someone else.The problem is we can use those same probabilities and math to prove you couldn't have been born. What is the probability that your mother and your father met each other out of all the billions of people in the world? What about their parents? And keep going back...the odds of YOU being born with all the possible combinations of people in the world are hardly calculable...yet here you are!
2nd April 2003 at 10:56 AM Jon said this in Post #4
That isn't probablitly. My mother and my father would have met someone, they just ended up meeting each other. If my father didn't meet my mother then he would have probably met someone else.
2nd April 2003 at 10:56 AM Jon said this in Post #4
That isn't probablitly. My mother and my father would have met someone, they just ended up meeting each other. If my father didn't meet my mother then he would have probably met someone else.
2nd April 2003 at 07:57 AM Pete Harcoff said this in Post #5
In a nutshell, the problem with that (and other probability calculations for abiogenesis), is it carries a basic bulit-in assumption that there is only one possible "path" for the formation of life and that it must occur in a specific sequence.
It would be like asking the probability of events that occured from the time I got up until the time I typed out this message. The probability would be astronomically high, but that's not the only possible sequence of events that could have occured that would result in me posting this message. It just happens to be the one that did.
2nd April 2003 at 11:06 AM LadyShea said this in Post #9
I was thinking this on the way to work...everything that happens in a normal day is a culmination of billions and billions of "chance" events. I passed a guy on the stairs...what are the odds that we (these particular two people) would be in the same country, the same city, the same building, the same staircase at the same time?
2nd April 2003 at 08:20 AM LadyShea said this in Post #13
I am not assuming anything. Hovind has been professionally refuted and his personal motives and methods brought under scrutiny. The guy is shady and deceptive at BEST.
That isn't a very good example. One person wins every time, however theres a very low probability that you will win.I mean, look at the lotery. Theres a very low probability of someone winning, Yet people often win.
2nd April 2003 at 08:21 PM Jon said this in Post #17
That isn't a very good example. One person wins every time, however theres a very low probability that you will win.
2nd April 2003 at 11:21 PM Jon said this in Post #17
That isn't a very good example. One person wins every time, however theres a very low probability that you will win.
2nd April 2003 at 08:12 AM Jon said this in Post #11
quote:
Hovind uses this stuff to try to confuse and confound people
Your assuming that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?