Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Preventing artificial intelligence from taking on negative human traits.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sjastro" data-source="post: 75960057" data-attributes="member: 352921"><p>The proof of the pudding is in the eating.</p><p>In a previous post I mentioned human chess players will sacrifice pawns to gain a tactical or winning advantage.</p><p>Occasionally top human players will also make positional or strategic sacrifices which are called speculative sacrifices as an advantage is not clear cut and is based on factors such as gut feelings or an attempt to unsettle the opponent.</p><p></p><p>Analysis of the games against Stockfish, a vastly more formidable opponent than the very best human players, indicated AlphaZero made positional sacrifices which were 100% sound and not speculative at all.</p><p>It played at a level not only beyond human players but Stockfish as well indicating there was no human influence in its play.</p><p>Stockfish being programmed with human chess knowledge lost decisively.</p><p></p><p>So yes while humans developed AlphaZero, the output of AlphaZero which is how the program played chess was not human like.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sjastro, post: 75960057, member: 352921"] The proof of the pudding is in the eating. In a previous post I mentioned human chess players will sacrifice pawns to gain a tactical or winning advantage. Occasionally top human players will also make positional or strategic sacrifices which are called speculative sacrifices as an advantage is not clear cut and is based on factors such as gut feelings or an attempt to unsettle the opponent. Analysis of the games against Stockfish, a vastly more formidable opponent than the very best human players, indicated AlphaZero made positional sacrifices which were 100% sound and not speculative at all. It played at a level not only beyond human players but Stockfish as well indicating there was no human influence in its play. Stockfish being programmed with human chess knowledge lost decisively. So yes while humans developed AlphaZero, the output of AlphaZero which is how the program played chess was not human like. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Preventing artificial intelligence from taking on negative human traits.
Top
Bottom