Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Preventing artificial intelligence from taking on negative human traits.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrumiousBandersnatch" data-source="post: 75947273" data-attributes="member: 241055"><p>The point is that the AI came up with a strategy that was totally novel and left-field - according to the world's top players. That doesn't mean someone wouldn't have come up with it eventually, but, more likely, that the AI's strategic developments were not constrained by the conventional wisdom of human strategies. Top human players do not learn strategy from scratch, but rely to a considerable extent on the accumulated knowledge of previous greats - who, in turn, learned from earlier masters.</p><p></p><p>I consider intelligence to be a measure of the ability to efficiently solve problems. There is domain-specific intelligence and general intelligence. </p><p></p><p>I don't know what you mean by 'free to think its thoughts'. If by 'thoughts' you mean information processing, all information processors are constrained in some way or other; e.g. by their processing resources and available data. </p><p></p><p>In a sense that's true of all information processors - in some the space is larger and more inclusive than in others.</p><p></p><p>AI's like Alpha Go are relatively simple domain-specific learning systems with more conventional modules associated. The more sophisticated biological brains are (roughly) complex networks of domain-specific and general-purpose learning systems with various processing 'accessories'. </p><p></p><p>I'm curious to know what you mean by 'independent thoughts'.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrumiousBandersnatch, post: 75947273, member: 241055"] The point is that the AI came up with a strategy that was totally novel and left-field - according to the world's top players. That doesn't mean someone wouldn't have come up with it eventually, but, more likely, that the AI's strategic developments were not constrained by the conventional wisdom of human strategies. Top human players do not learn strategy from scratch, but rely to a considerable extent on the accumulated knowledge of previous greats - who, in turn, learned from earlier masters. I consider intelligence to be a measure of the ability to efficiently solve problems. There is domain-specific intelligence and general intelligence. I don't know what you mean by 'free to think its thoughts'. If by 'thoughts' you mean information processing, all information processors are constrained in some way or other; e.g. by their processing resources and available data. In a sense that's true of all information processors - in some the space is larger and more inclusive than in others. AI's like Alpha Go are relatively simple domain-specific learning systems with more conventional modules associated. The more sophisticated biological brains are (roughly) complex networks of domain-specific and general-purpose learning systems with various processing 'accessories'. I'm curious to know what you mean by 'independent thoughts'. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Preventing artificial intelligence from taking on negative human traits.
Top
Bottom