Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Preventing artificial intelligence from taking on negative human traits.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J_B_" data-source="post: 75943190" data-attributes="member: 428251"><p>It appears I've irritated you, so I will be brief with no claim this fully explains my position. If you wish, consider this an invitation to explore our conversation further.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The OP wasn't about chess. My posts were meant to address what I drew from the OP ... but OK ... it's about chess AI now.</p><p></p><p>I know you don't take chess AI as sentience. I acknowledged that in my post to you, if you happened to notice it. I know because you said as much in <a href="https://www.christianforums.com/threads/preventing-artificial-intelligence-from-taking-on-negative-human-traits.8207807/#post-75935704" target="_blank">post #7</a>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I said no such thing. I've tried to avoid saying something else because it's not complimentary, and I'd prefer not, but you appear to completely miss what I'm saying. It happens to me frequently in my job where engineers are so enamored with their technology that they can't make the human connection with managers who have a different outlook. I constantly get these bewildered looks from managers and engineers who can't talk to each other, and often find myself in the role of interpreter.</p><p></p><p>So I'll start with this simple question. If you want to continue, it would be helpful to answer it: Define the terms "teach" and/or "learn" within the context of AI. Not your own impression of their definition, but the definition accepted within the field.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J_B_, post: 75943190, member: 428251"] It appears I've irritated you, so I will be brief with no claim this fully explains my position. If you wish, consider this an invitation to explore our conversation further. The OP wasn't about chess. My posts were meant to address what I drew from the OP ... but OK ... it's about chess AI now. I know you don't take chess AI as sentience. I acknowledged that in my post to you, if you happened to notice it. I know because you said as much in [URL='https://www.christianforums.com/threads/preventing-artificial-intelligence-from-taking-on-negative-human-traits.8207807/#post-75935704']post #7[/URL]. I said no such thing. I've tried to avoid saying something else because it's not complimentary, and I'd prefer not, but you appear to completely miss what I'm saying. It happens to me frequently in my job where engineers are so enamored with their technology that they can't make the human connection with managers who have a different outlook. I constantly get these bewildered looks from managers and engineers who can't talk to each other, and often find myself in the role of interpreter. So I'll start with this simple question. If you want to continue, it would be helpful to answer it: Define the terms "teach" and/or "learn" within the context of AI. Not your own impression of their definition, but the definition accepted within the field. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Preventing artificial intelligence from taking on negative human traits.
Top
Bottom