Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Preventing artificial intelligence from taking on negative human traits.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="durangodawood" data-source="post: 75943042" data-attributes="member: 200668"><p>I'm just appealing to how people generally view intelligence. If you can perform X intellectual task faster, people consider you smarter. But thats just one factor of many. Depth of thought is another factor, one which may well trump speed depending on the task. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I dont think its proper to call a very fast calculating machine "intelligent"....yet. But I can picture a day when one will fool even the best of us into believe it possesses true intelligence. Even further afield is a true sentient machine "self". Not sure this is actually possible. But who can say for sure?</p><p></p><p></p><p>I dont see evidence that <em>we</em> innovated our own adaptability. Either it evolved naturalistically, or a being created us with it. Either way, we cant take credit.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I dont think that's true strictly speaking. No one programmed AG to make<em> those moves</em>. Nobody even knew about those moves. They programmed AG to go out and discover new advantageous moves.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Youre talking now about a being who can situate itself outside the game, with its own motivations entirely apart from the game. I agree this is the "strong AI" that I would consider "an intelligence".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="durangodawood, post: 75943042, member: 200668"] I'm just appealing to how people generally view intelligence. If you can perform X intellectual task faster, people consider you smarter. But thats just one factor of many. Depth of thought is another factor, one which may well trump speed depending on the task. I dont think its proper to call a very fast calculating machine "intelligent"....yet. But I can picture a day when one will fool even the best of us into believe it possesses true intelligence. Even further afield is a true sentient machine "self". Not sure this is actually possible. But who can say for sure? I dont see evidence that [I]we[/I] innovated our own adaptability. Either it evolved naturalistically, or a being created us with it. Either way, we cant take credit. I dont think that's true strictly speaking. No one programmed AG to make[I] those moves[/I]. Nobody even knew about those moves. They programmed AG to go out and discover new advantageous moves. Youre talking now about a being who can situate itself outside the game, with its own motivations entirely apart from the game. I agree this is the "strong AI" that I would consider "an intelligence". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Preventing artificial intelligence from taking on negative human traits.
Top
Bottom