Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Presupposition: mutation comes before adaptation - justified *how*?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gottservant" data-source="post: 76272871" data-attributes="member: 158134"><p>Studies in plants have shown that DNA changes position (within the plant) in conjunction with the seasons (Australian Science Magazine, exact reference beyond recollection)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You are assuming you know how adaptations work, out of an appeal to necessity.</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying mutation doesn't ever invoke a review of damaged DNA, I'm saying the focus of the DNA is never second place to mutation - the review of damaged DNA aims to restore the DNA to its best possible or better state. No one takes perfectly good DNA and hopes they'll get better, should more and more of it mutate - they simply settle for something close to restored, if it proves strong. Anything less than that and you have cancer or death.</p><p></p><p>That's what your DNA is screaming at you "mutate less, not more!"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The first creatures on earth, did not mutate at random - their adaptations were a gift from God (as God added strength to them, in the form that He wished to give them) - they may have mutated at times, but on the whole they did not desire to stray from God, and so we have what we see today!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gottservant, post: 76272871, member: 158134"] Studies in plants have shown that DNA changes position (within the plant) in conjunction with the seasons (Australian Science Magazine, exact reference beyond recollection) You are assuming you know how adaptations work, out of an appeal to necessity. I'm not saying mutation doesn't ever invoke a review of damaged DNA, I'm saying the focus of the DNA is never second place to mutation - the review of damaged DNA aims to restore the DNA to its best possible or better state. No one takes perfectly good DNA and hopes they'll get better, should more and more of it mutate - they simply settle for something close to restored, if it proves strong. Anything less than that and you have cancer or death. That's what your DNA is screaming at you "mutate less, not more!" The first creatures on earth, did not mutate at random - their adaptations were a gift from God (as God added strength to them, in the form that He wished to give them) - they may have mutated at times, but on the whole they did not desire to stray from God, and so we have what we see today! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Presupposition: mutation comes before adaptation - justified *how*?
Top
Bottom