Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Presupposition: mutation comes before adaptation - justified *how*?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shemjaza" data-source="post: 76257338" data-attributes="member: 146291"><p>We are talking about evolution, then we should use consistent definitions.</p><p></p><p>Evolution only applies to traits of species that are genetic in origin.</p><p></p><p>If you want to talk about some other trait, feature or event then evolution isn't relevant.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's still just an adaptation with more than one consequence.</p><p></p><p>Species gain more adaptions over the generations... individuals do not.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It is the same word, but the sentence doesn't make sense.</p><p></p><p>For example as an explanation of what a cake is: "The cake is made from cake!" is using the same word, but the sentence is meaningless.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am not trying to have any subtext in my words.</p><p></p><p>I do not think it's reasonable to think "sinless interpretation" and "legitimate scientific understanding" of as the same thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shemjaza, post: 76257338, member: 146291"] We are talking about evolution, then we should use consistent definitions. Evolution only applies to traits of species that are genetic in origin. If you want to talk about some other trait, feature or event then evolution isn't relevant. That's still just an adaptation with more than one consequence. Species gain more adaptions over the generations... individuals do not. It is the same word, but the sentence doesn't make sense. For example as an explanation of what a cake is: "The cake is made from cake!" is using the same word, but the sentence is meaningless. I am not trying to have any subtext in my words. I do not think it's reasonable to think "sinless interpretation" and "legitimate scientific understanding" of as the same thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Presupposition: mutation comes before adaptation - justified *how*?
Top
Bottom