• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Predatory Christianity

seashale76

Unapologetic Iconodule
Dec 29, 2004
14,046
4,454
✟211,755.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Melkite Catholic
Marital Status
Married
So I ask you, is it right for Christians to prey upon vulnerable children to spread their beliefs?
I didn't read the article- conversion should be of the heart- not forced. If someone attempted to do that, then they're wrong.

Honestly, I have to say the vast/overwhelming majority of Christians who have exchange students don't do anything like that.

Is it right for anyone to prey on vulnerable children to spread their beliefs?
No.
Do you think Atheists prey upon children?
I bet as many atheists do so as Christians.

Do you think Gays prey upon children?
Oh, probably about as many as the Christians and the atheists, I'd say.

Your questions are flawed, because what's true for some isn't true for all, or even a majority.
 
Upvote 0

Risen Tree

previously Rising Tree
Nov 20, 2002
6,988
328
Georgia
✟33,382.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
56 years as a a member of the church and as a church historian.

Anecdotal evidence. Sorry!

Post proof or retract.

Marksman, can we please not play these games? You don't "prove" an opinion; you support it or refute it.


Seashale, if you are or have been a parent, I sense you have a genuine desire to do the right thing at all times with your children. (And if you haven't had any yet, I'm pretty sure things will go well for you, if and when you do.)

Unfortunately, some parents do not share this same desire. There are those who believe they have the right to physically abuse, indoctrinate, repeatedly humiliate, or even molest their own children. It is because of people who think they have the right to do these things, not people such as you, that parenthood should be a privilege.

I am the greatest genius that has ever lived, therefore everything I say is true. You have to believe me, I am posting it on the Internet.

It is settled, then.

(yes I know you're just joking )
 
Reactions: seashale76
Upvote 0

marksman007

Old Hand
Oct 8, 2008
683
17
83
Victoria
Visit site
✟23,542.00
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
It is because of people who think they have the right to do these things, not people such as you, that parenthood should be a privilege.

That was not the impication of your previous post. You gave the impression that parenting was a priviledge for everyone. parenting is a gift from God. What we do with it is in our hands. The government encourages bad parenting and single parenting with their policies so they have to accept the outcomes and pay for them.
 
Upvote 0

ragarth

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2008
1,217
62
Virginia, USA
✟1,704.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single

Granted I only know you from this single post, but given my impression of it, you'll make a very decent parent.
 
Reactions: seashale76
Upvote 0

ragarth

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2008
1,217
62
Virginia, USA
✟1,704.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single

Yes I would.
How about you address the post I made and I'll think about answering those questions when I see that you're capable of a rational OP.

I didn't answer because at that time I was gathering opinions, not debating people's opinions. You see, sometimes I just want to learn, not butt heads with people. It was only after the thread broke down from direct answerings to debate that I began debating.

Now, to your questions, I gather from your 1st post in this thread that you seem to believe the ends justify the means. While Marine's conversion didn't begin and end with the mother's tears and the father's ultimatums, they did apparently begin with them, therefore the means of her conversion was emotional manipulation.

The rest of your post is a pair of red herrings. I didn't mention Marine's parents or her sister because they were not part of the scope of this post and its topic, but also because there is very little information about them- we can only make assumptions about the interaction of them between the Exchange home, the parents, marine, and her sister- and assuming seems to be a good bit of what you're doing. Tell me, how do you know what Marine had told her parents, or the method of Marine's sister's conversion? If you have additional resources that provide this information, by all means share them. Unless you do, however, your reference of these two seperate issues is not more than a red herring.

Now, would you like to answer the rest of my questions? To be honest, it doesn't matter much anymore, the thread has moved from information gathering to debate now, so you can do what you wish.
 
Upvote 0

ragarth

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2008
1,217
62
Virginia, USA
✟1,704.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single

I don't know what the frequency of this is, however frequency is irrelevant. I made no statement signifying that this was a majority of Christians, and as shown thus far in this thread the majority of Christians don't agree with such practices. You're putting words in my mouth, turning me into a strawman argument. Please stop.

I'm sorry you feel this way, let us presume (and I don't believe this since you failed to provide any backing facts) that there is a corellation of atheists having a higher suicide rate (again disclaimer: I doubt this is true, you provided no facts, we're just playing to your fantasy). Then there would be a corellation between the two, corellation does not equal causation, therefore corellation of suicide and atheism (again, no proof of any said corellation, just playing to fantasy here) does not mean atheism causes suicide. Indeed, I'd think it more likely that the social 'shunning' of christians and of christian parents would be a more likely cause since such things have social and emotional impacts.

Also, as a side note, you clearly don't understand atheist philosophy, how about you try not to tell me what I think, because you clearly fail so thoroughly at it.

Christian young people rarely suicide because they know their origins, they know they have a purpose for living and they know that when they die, it is only the beginning of eternity.
First, you provide no proof. It's my opinion that the suicide rate between atheist and theist are about equal. Give proof or watch me giggle.

Somehow I think you've been duped. Care to provide facts? I googled 'william allen' and all I got was a historical figure that died back in 1856. We didn't have the internet back in 1856 last I was aware.

Also, your claim is cancelled out by my claim that using the argument 'my claim cancels your claim' isn't really an argument at all.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Inviolable

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2006
2,285
59
✟3,179.00
Faith
Christian
I never said that, all I did was post the information within the article that you left out.
The rest of your post is a pair of red herrings.
No. It wasn't.
There was enough information within the article you left to argue what you said.
All I did was give the additional information. There was no actual argument as of yet and still isn't. But that's not my fault.
I didn't mention Marine's parents or her sister because they were not part of the scope of this post and its topic,
But you did ask how the reader would feel had their children been converted by atheist and made a comment with no identifiable point.
Meaning, you left the reader with only one assumption to make and that is that Marine's parent should have been angry.

but also because there is very little information about them-
That is true but it is still enough information to question your entire OP.
we can only make assumptions about the interaction of them between the Exchange home, the parents, marine, and her sister- and assuming seems to be a good bit of what you're doing.
While it is true that we can only assume what her parent's thought, I never suggested what that was.
Once again. I only left the information that was in the article that you left out.
Tell me, how do you know what Marine had told her parents,
I don't.
However, the article claims that she was at home with her parents for an entire year. And toward the end of that year she invited the Christians to her house.
My question to you was, why didn't Marines parent's make any protest to the Christians?
I asked that question because Marine's parent's obviously allowed her to return to the United States with the Christians.
or the method of Marine's sister's conversion? If you have additional resources that provide this information, by all means share them.
"When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better."

The article only leaves the reader to believe her sister was influenced by both the Christians and Marine.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor#cite_note-1
Marines sister would not have had contact with the Christians had Marines parent's not allowed them to visit in the first place.

Which leaves your hypothesis in questionable standing.


Now, would you like to answer the rest of my questions? To be honest, it doesn't matter much anymore, the thread has moved from information gathering to debate now, so you can do what you wish.
O.K.
See ya.
 
Upvote 0

Risen Tree

previously Rising Tree
Nov 20, 2002
6,988
328
Georgia
✟33,382.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
No need to be.

You know what, you have a point. When I point out logical errors, there is no need to apologize for doing so.

But I was enjoying myself. Ah well, I guess as you started the game you have the right to stop it.

Pot, meet kettle. I know this game, marksman; I know how people play it.

That was not the impication of your previous post. You gave the impression that parenting was a priviledge for everyone. parenting is a gift from God. What we do with it is in our hands.

Why are you distorting my words? Where did I imply that parenting was a privilege for everyone? It is a privilege only for those who deserve it, which I believe is the majority of adults, but not all of them.

The government encourages bad parenting and single parenting with their policies so they have to accept the outcomes and pay for them.

1. Post proof of the first claim or retract. Your claim is a claim of fact and requires robust evidence in order to be taken as true.

2. Even if your claim were true, why do you believe that parents should be immune from rules designed to protect children?
 
Upvote 0

marksman007

Old Hand
Oct 8, 2008
683
17
83
Victoria
Visit site
✟23,542.00
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Somehow I think you've been duped. Care to provide facts? I googled 'william allen' and all I got was a historical figure that died back in 1856. We didn't have the internet back in 1856 last I was aware.

It is obvious that Satan has blinded your eyes to reality. You obviously live your life through other people's opinions and books so you avoid the real world. Let me say it again "I HEARD". This means he was talking I was listening. Next you will be asking me to provide proof that I said to my grandchildren that I love them. Unfortunately for you, I didn't put this on the internet, so you will have to take my word for it.
 
Upvote 0

marksman007

Old Hand
Oct 8, 2008
683
17
83
Victoria
Visit site
✟23,542.00
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Your claim is a claim of fact and requires robust evidence in order to be taken as true.

Well, who would have thought. You obviously haven't worked out that I don't care whether you believe me or not. On judgement day I only have to answer to one person and that is God himself so the only thing that matters to me is to do what he wants me to do. Your demands are totally inconsequential as you cannot make any difference whatsoever to my salvation.
 
Upvote 0