Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Population control & scientfic breeding
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daniel19" data-source="post: 43226233" data-attributes="member: 127107"><p>All of this is based on hard research, just in case you'd like to know. <strong>This isn't a joke, and it's not a game.</strong></p><p> </p><p>It is quite interesting when you find out that eugenicists were instrumental in forming the education system in the United States. </p><p> </p><p>In the eyes of many of the individuals who formed public schooling, intellectual development should not be stressed. Instead, obedience and compliance. Industrialists of the 20th century like Rockefeller, Carnegie and others were some of the main players. Educated minds were a threat to domination and order in the workplace. Interestingly, these same families were instrumental in funding and promoting eugenics at the same time. </p><p> </p><p>In fact, Woodrow Wilson stated that what we needed was a two tiered education system, one for the intellectual elite, and one for the genetically inferrior underclass who would be brought up to do menial tasks.</p><p> </p><p>The term "moron" was coined by eugenicists as well. </p><p> </p><p>Bertrand Russel himself stated that education, in the hands of the state, could accomplish more than troops with guns in hand in just a few years. </p><p> </p><p>The scientific dictatorship, in the eyes of the elite, would be a utopia of sorts. Of course, this utopia would be sold as being for the benefit of the average man and woman. A genetically superior, technologically advanced elite would sit atop the mass of humanity, guiding them according to the "good will" of the overseers. We see this vision of the future from Aldous Huxley, H.G. Wells, Russel, and many others. </p><p> </p><p>Science fiction seems to portray this vision of the future more often than not. A utopia of mechanization and a perfection of social order, while mankind is portrayed as lacking vital parts of their humanity underneath the weight of a great managerial system.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daniel19, post: 43226233, member: 127107"] All of this is based on hard research, just in case you'd like to know. [B]This isn't a joke, and it's not a game.[/B] It is quite interesting when you find out that eugenicists were instrumental in forming the education system in the United States. In the eyes of many of the individuals who formed public schooling, intellectual development should not be stressed. Instead, obedience and compliance. Industrialists of the 20th century like Rockefeller, Carnegie and others were some of the main players. Educated minds were a threat to domination and order in the workplace. Interestingly, these same families were instrumental in funding and promoting eugenics at the same time. In fact, Woodrow Wilson stated that what we needed was a two tiered education system, one for the intellectual elite, and one for the genetically inferrior underclass who would be brought up to do menial tasks. The term "moron" was coined by eugenicists as well. Bertrand Russel himself stated that education, in the hands of the state, could accomplish more than troops with guns in hand in just a few years. The scientific dictatorship, in the eyes of the elite, would be a utopia of sorts. Of course, this utopia would be sold as being for the benefit of the average man and woman. A genetically superior, technologically advanced elite would sit atop the mass of humanity, guiding them according to the "good will" of the overseers. We see this vision of the future from Aldous Huxley, H.G. Wells, Russel, and many others. Science fiction seems to portray this vision of the future more often than not. A utopia of mechanization and a perfection of social order, while mankind is portrayed as lacking vital parts of their humanity underneath the weight of a great managerial system. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
Population control & scientfic breeding
Top
Bottom