Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Remember, for future reference, I'm an Adventist that doesn't agree she was 100% prophetess. That doesn't mean to say that I don't think God had a hand in her writings.
BFA1, I did not see this post before making my second comment on the topic. If indeed, as you say, this was entirely a post of your generated content, then I most certainly owe you an apology.
Of course, I still disagree with the content 100% but that's another story.
So what is Gal 3:24? I believe it to be all law.
And thanks for telling me about your feelings for EGW.
I accept your apology and I'm happy to leave it behind us. However, it is my hope that you will be a bit more careful when you consider making any other public allegations about me, especially those that question my integrity. Even though we may disagree, I would think that we could do so in a way that is more pleasing to God. OK?
Since I spent a great deal of time on that post, I hope that you will respond directly to the points presented and that you will explain the reasons why you disagree with them.
Wow, the same position I have taken on this issue since day one and I get slaughtered and falsely charged with 'attacking' her, 'refuting' her and 'hating' her. Yet a Trad takes the same position and not a murmur is heard from the EGW venerators.
How does that work?
I already did. Your post, while certainly a wonderful compliation ( I hope you saved it) does nothing to reverse the fact that there is a clear and distinct division of the covenant and Mosaic laws.
I have asked repeatedly for you to provide a dissertation that the TC pointed to the Messiah in some way and how it pointed to the Messiah. Short of that, one would be hard pressed to prove that all laws are the same.
Not to belabor the point but clearly a law that says a woman is unclean for X number of days because of her menstruating is considerablly different than "thou shalt not steal." Yet neither points to the coming Messiah.
Laws about the sacrifcing of lambs on certain feast days were also laws, yet specifically pointed to the coming Messiah. Therefore, it has to be concluded from shear logic that there was and is a distinct difference in these laws.
You claim that there is a clear and distinct division, and yet my previous post demonstrates that there is no clear and distinct division. I'm afraid I will need more evidence than "the brain" on this one.
And I've asked for the Biblical relevance.
Absent a passage from Scripture that states that God intended that some laws would point to the Messiah and others would not and/or a passage from Scripture that God intended for the old covenant laws to be divided in such a manner, you are merely seeking to create man-made classifications of law.
So, in your opinion, which are to keep today--the laws that you believe point to Christ, or the ones that you believe do not?
Upon what Scripture do you base this conclusion?
Do you conclude that sabbaths point to Christ?
He won't be a bleeding heart Liberal when he rains fire down on the wicked.
Or has the Heavenly Sanctuary crowd convinced you this will not take place?
We should go back to post #118 and take it from where DJconklin left it. One can't have a correct understanding of the Law in the Old Covenant if they build it off an incorrect undstanding of God, AKA the Holy Trinity.Really?!? When did this happen? Where's the proof? Show me the evidence in SDA teaching.
Nope. He ascended in bodily form, but decended to earth as spirit. When Christ came to earth it forever changed the nature of of God's bodily form.[/quote]
How many times have I ASKED YOU NICELY where EXACTLY IN THE BIBLE can you find that stated?????
Please supply exact book, chapter and verse.
You stated "Oh, I posted it before!", but have NOT EVER provided a link, nor a book, chapter or verse in the Bible.
Please provide the proof, or else admit that you stated a heresy.
And I've shown you. Several times. Christ didn't come to fulfill all the law, just the law "concerning" Him. Let's review, one mo' time.
We should go back to post #118 and take it from where DJconklin left it. One can't have a correct understanding of the Law in the Old Covenant if they build it off an incorrect undstanding of God, AKA the Holy Trinity.
EXACTLY ! WOW... I'm surprisedly happy to see that here!
Since the Jews did not have any idea what 'trinity' was,
except for 'UNHOLY' pagan uses of trinity concept later accepted by the world church,
the Jews abiding in Yahweh's Word had a clear knowledge of Yahweh and His Rules and His Purpose much greater than any gentiles.
So many gentiles have ALWAYS HAD an incorrect understanding of Yahweh (even NOT KNOWING HIS NAME) and were brought up trained since birth that the pagan trinity was from a Biblical Source (obviously not to anyone with a 3rd grade education in Hebrew language)
, but since the gentiles don't know better - how could they know? who would there be to tell them ?? - they continue in ignorance unless they leave their family and friends and church to learn the truth.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?