Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Pfizer + BioNTech COVID vaccine tested in a lab alter DNA, Swedish study finds.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BobRyan" data-source="post: 76843395" data-attributes="member: 235244"><p>1. Point 1 - don't get the COVID virus because it can do the very thing you want to avoid.</p><p>2. Point 2 - the vaccine is not the entire virus - it is only the spike protein. But COVID is the entire virus.</p><p>3. Point 3 - that same Swedish study group admits that the lab test procedure itself is known to cause that very result --- not because of the virus or the vaccine - but because the process they are using is known to erroneously produce that result in the liver cancer cells they are working with.</p><p></p><p>From: <a href="https://www.science.org/content/article/further-evidence-offered-claim-genes-pandemic-coronavirus-can-integrate-human-dna" target="_blank">Science | AAAS</a></p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">“Many researchers who specialize in LINE-1 elements and other "retrotransposons" thought the data were too thin to support the claim. "If I would have had this data, I would have not submitted to any publication at that point," says Cornell University's Cedric Feschotte, who studies endogenous retrovirus chunks in the human genome. He and others also said they expected higher quality work coming from scientists of the caliber of Jaenisch and Young.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">"In two subsequent studies, both posted on bioRxiv, critics presented <strong>evidence that the supposed chimeras of human and viral DNA traces <span style="color: #ff0000">are routinely created by the very technique </span>the group used </strong>to scan for them in chromosomes. As <a href="https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.434119v1.full.pdf" target="_blank">one report</a> concluded, the human-virus sequences "are <u><span style="color: #ff0000">more likely to be a methodological product</span></u>, [sic] than the result of genuine reverse transcription, integration and expression."</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">“In their new paper, Jaenisch, Young, and colleagues acknowledge that <u><span style="color: #ff0000">the technique</span></u> they used <strong><span style="color: #ff0000">accidentally </span>creates human-viral chimeras</strong>. "I think it's a valid point," Jaenisch says. He adds that when they first submitted the paper to a journal, <strong><u>they knew it needed stronger data</u></strong>, which they hoped to add during the review process. But the journal, like many, requires authors to immediately post all COVID-19 results to a preprint server. "I probably should have said s____ you, I won't put it on bioRxiv. It was a misjudgment," <u><strong>Jaenisch </strong></u>says</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p>=======================================</p><p></p><p>So I am all for avoiding needless boosters after getting natural immunity from OMICRON etc .... I still say "pay attention to details" in these flair-up sensation grenades that the media sometimes drops into the discussion only to see the very source of that sensation idea later admit that they were in error. IN this case Jaenisch tries to blame the journal that published his not-yet-fully-verified half-baked conclusions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BobRyan, post: 76843395, member: 235244"] 1. Point 1 - don't get the COVID virus because it can do the very thing you want to avoid. 2. Point 2 - the vaccine is not the entire virus - it is only the spike protein. But COVID is the entire virus. 3. Point 3 - that same Swedish study group admits that the lab test procedure itself is known to cause that very result --- not because of the virus or the vaccine - but because the process they are using is known to erroneously produce that result in the liver cancer cells they are working with. From: [URL='https://www.science.org/content/article/further-evidence-offered-claim-genes-pandemic-coronavirus-can-integrate-human-dna']Science | AAAS[/URL] [INDENT]“Many researchers who specialize in LINE-1 elements and other "retrotransposons" thought the data were too thin to support the claim. "If I would have had this data, I would have not submitted to any publication at that point," says Cornell University's Cedric Feschotte, who studies endogenous retrovirus chunks in the human genome. He and others also said they expected higher quality work coming from scientists of the caliber of Jaenisch and Young. "In two subsequent studies, both posted on bioRxiv, critics presented [B]evidence that the supposed chimeras of human and viral DNA traces [COLOR=#ff0000]are routinely created by the very technique [/COLOR]the group used [/B]to scan for them in chromosomes. As [URL='https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.05.434119v1.full.pdf']one report[/URL] concluded, the human-virus sequences "are [U][COLOR=#ff0000]more likely to be a methodological product[/COLOR][/U], [sic] than the result of genuine reverse transcription, integration and expression." “In their new paper, Jaenisch, Young, and colleagues acknowledge that [U][COLOR=#ff0000]the technique[/COLOR][/U] they used [B][COLOR=#ff0000]accidentally [/COLOR]creates human-viral chimeras[/B]. "I think it's a valid point," Jaenisch says. He adds that when they first submitted the paper to a journal, [B][U]they knew it needed stronger data[/U][/B], which they hoped to add during the review process. But the journal, like many, requires authors to immediately post all COVID-19 results to a preprint server. "I probably should have said s____ you, I won't put it on bioRxiv. It was a misjudgment," [U][B]Jaenisch [/B][/U]says [/INDENT] ======================================= So I am all for avoiding needless boosters after getting natural immunity from OMICRON etc .... I still say "pay attention to details" in these flair-up sensation grenades that the media sometimes drops into the discussion only to see the very source of that sensation idea later admit that they were in error. IN this case Jaenisch tries to blame the journal that published his not-yet-fully-verified half-baked conclusions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Pfizer + BioNTech COVID vaccine tested in a lab alter DNA, Swedish study finds.
Top
Bottom