• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Personality Tests...are they useful?

Status
Not open for further replies.

~InHisHands~

At the feet of Jesus
Sep 3, 2006
3,573
0
✟26,231.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'm well aware of all this. But, thank you.
 
Upvote 0

ACADEMIC

The Roving Forums Scholar
Aug 13, 2006
492
29
✟15,781.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I wanted to add that nearly all of the Internet tests and explanations for the Jungian types we have been talking about are of considerable less quality than those in the Kierssey-Bates books and Myers-Briggs.

All of the one's on the Internet I have seen, except from those two sources, are written by relative novices who have had little choice but to write their own tests and descriptions due to copyright restrictions on the Kierssey-Bates books and Myers-Briggs.

The other Internet ones certainly have some value, but I just do not think they are as accurate, at least the ones I have seen.

Cool! Gobs of used copies of the Kierssey-Bates book are available for as cheap as $1 here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0960695400/ref=dp_olp_2/104-3312500-8301522?ie=UTF8
 
Upvote 0

artrx

listening
Oct 22, 2005
6,469
249
63
northern VA
✟7,846.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

I am also an INFP. There is a similar thread in the anglican forum and it is surprising how many INFP's have been there as well. According to Myer's-Briggs we're only 1% of the population. Except that our and other NP types may be attracted to these types of forum discussions with multiple viewpoints. It has also been noted that there are a high percentage of NF's as priests.
 
Upvote 0

FallingWaters

Woman of God
Mar 29, 2006
8,509
3,321
Maine
✟46,402.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Yeah... I just wonder what percentage of each type spend time on line. Generally speaking, I have a feeling there are more Ns than Ss. S is a hands-on preference. The computer lacks the right kind of thrill for an S.

I once saw a web site that was taking a poll of the types visiting his page, but those are just the folks who happen across his page, not the whole internet.

Hey I wonder if I could get a government grant for hundreds of thousands of dollars to conduct a study?!
 
Upvote 0

artrx

listening
Oct 22, 2005
6,469
249
63
northern VA
✟7,846.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm pretty sure the statistic is that one percent of all Americans are INFPs.
Yes, and the NF's who are priests can be either J or P. In fact many are J, not P. INFJ's make up about 5% of the total population. BUT this is all in statistical generalities, interesting but not absolute. In fact there is still a great deal of difference between people of the same personality type anyway. Life experiences have a huge impact.
 
Reactions: FallingWaters
Upvote 0

ACADEMIC

The Roving Forums Scholar
Aug 13, 2006
492
29
✟15,781.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Kierssey-Bates argue that their percentages are regarding the total of human populatons, not just Americans. The 16 types they describe are universal among all humans, in their view (and mine).

At the same time, both they and Miers-Briggs (and me, he-he) recognize their descriptions of the types as strongly biased toward exhibitions of the types among Westerners.

Kierssey-Bates' Please Understand Me has been translated into a scad of European languages.
 
Upvote 0

FallingWaters

Woman of God
Mar 29, 2006
8,509
3,321
Maine
✟46,402.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
The computer is a thrill for me. My thing is the issue of monotony. I like variety in my life with certain things.
I guess "thrill" wasn't the perfect word to use. There probably is no one word that would describe it. I only meant that a computer provides less "sensory" activity such as an "S" usually prefers.

Not that "S" people never use a computer- though I know many "S" people who "hate" them. I just think that out of all the people who enjoy using the internet, who use it not because their job forces them to, but because they choose to, I think the percentage of "N" people online is higher than that of the general population.

According to Keirsey, 75% of the population is "S" and 25% is "N". My point is that if there was a way to find out, we might discover that the online population might be more like 50-50. And who knows what the specific population here on CF might look like?!
 
Upvote 0

FallingWaters

Woman of God
Mar 29, 2006
8,509
3,321
Maine
✟46,402.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Thanks for that clarification. I agree with the Keirsey-Bates premise. And the Myers-Briggs premise, too.

Hey! I guess that means that I agree with you!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.