Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
As we discussed in private conversation, if there really is a Satan who is trying to deceive you as a means of securing your damnation, then it is very important that you know you have acquired beliefs that are genuinely salvific, and not beliefs that you have honestly mistaken as salvific, but which would actually condemn you to Hell. (I alluded to this in an earlier discussion.) If Satan is as clever as you say, then wouldn't he try to give you apparently salvific beliefs that you must not question?Yes, I do insulate and protect my beliefs because there are those that would have me doubt them and give them up. Satan is a liar and a deceiver and he is very clever.
The better question is, what are you trying to convince this person of? If your trying to convince us there is no God, you're doing a really lousy job. You forget that we're claiming God is perfect, therefore, for you to convince us He's not real, you'd have to be perfect just like God, thereby making you God, thus proving God is perfect.
I didn't say I was trying to convince anyone of anything, it was other other poster, that stated they are willing to be convinced.
I could care less what someone believes or doesn't believe, but I am much more interested in how a person justifies why they believe or don't believe what they do and that is where discussion becomes interesting.
This person claimed they were open to information and then claimed there was a zero percent chance they were wrong. Seems like a giant contradiction to me.
So does convincing this person that they contradicted themselves give you hope that they will stop believing in God? What if they don't stop believing in God even though you pointed out that they contradicted themselves? What then is the point of pointing out the contradiction? Is the point to justify your own unjustified beliefs?
As we discussed in private conversation, if there really is a Satan who is trying to deceive you as a means of securing your damnation, then it is very important that you know you have acquired beliefs that are genuinely salvific, and not beliefs that you have honestly mistaken as salvific, but which would actually condemn you to Hell. (I alluded to this in an earlier discussion.) If Satan is as clever as you say, then wouldn't he try to give you apparently salvific beliefs that you must not question?
There's controversial, and then there's controversial.Of course it is controversial. It is controversial because of its implications.
None of the proposed models that include a past eternal universe can be squared with the mathematical proofs which demonstrate that any universe which is on average in a state of expansion, must be past-finite.
I will say again, I could care less what a person believes. The interesting discussion comes from, how one justifies what they believe.
No need to worry about Satan then, right?
You realise that that makes no sense?Right, and it appears you justify your lack of belief in a perfect God by pointing out the contradictions of those who do believe in a perfect God. So if I put myself in your shoes and I honestly ask myself why I'm pointing out contradictions in other people who I understand are not perfect, I think I would then realize that I'm being very hypocritical because I myself am not perfect either so maybe I should reconsider my non-belief in a perfect God.
Just a thought
You realise that that makes no sense?
Yes, and I'm not the only one whose noticed that many of your posts do not make sense.You say that a lot about what I say. I wouldn't post it if I didn't think it made sense. Just because you're incapable of answering questions I pose does not mean what I'm saying does not make sense. All it really means is that your incapable of answering questions I pose.
Yes, and I'm not the only one whose noticed that many of your posts do not make sense.
You didn't have a point. You seem to be under the impression that you are posting very profound things. What you're posting isn't even wrong.Thanks for proving my point
The honest question is still on the table, unanswered.
You didn't have a point. You seem to be under the impression that are posting very profound things. What you're posting isn't even wrong.
Right, and it appears you justify your lack of belief in a perfect God by pointing out the contradictions of those who do believe in a perfect God. So if I put myself in your shoes and I honestly ask myself why I'm pointing out contradictions in other people who I understand are not perfect, I think I would then realize that I'm being very hypocritical because I myself am not perfect either so maybe I should reconsider my non-belief in a perfect God.
Just a thought
I have yet to see this "good reasons and evidence".It is not presumptuous to claim that one knows something to be true when they have good reasons and evidence to back up their claim.
I happen to agree with him. Talking with skeptics only helps me realize that my beliefs are grounded on good reasons and evidence because my beliefs time and time again withstand the scrutiny to which I willingly subject them.
So is the idea that the Earth hangs motionless in space and that the cosmos rotates around it.If there were not evidence for my beliefs, they would not be my beliefs. All of my beliefs are evidenced and supported in sundry ways.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?