Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Paul Craig Roberts: Sanctions May Lead To War
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="StarTemple" data-source="post: 66796500" data-attributes="member: 367539"><p>Well the Islam religious global polarity now has the Cold War 2.0 ultimate political polarity dynamic with Russia so about all possible "bogey man" scenarios are contained in those two. China is just the cherry on top.</p><p></p><p>Truly this is an astounding scale and nature of potential destabilization, I mean MASSIVE. But well see how it goes, I'm not a "doomsdayer", I think it is a cycle to world stability a number of years into the final cycle.</p><p></p><p>Gauging the way this all "emerges" into the media it seems a bit "predictive" if you ask me, of the future of the two polarities actually, imo, preparing to merge into a uni-polarity by "force" if need be, and I don't mean just military force, but also financial and the quasi-spiritual.</p><p></p><p>Imo the masses are so distracted the program of the play has to explained before the play begins, or no one would figure out just what they are supposed to think as these things intensify. Imo, many Americans and others need someone to outright tell them EXACTLY what to think, sort of like a human drone.</p><p></p><p>Global NATO is the core entity that has goals of monopoly, which is actually logical. Whatever it is I do not think it is "doomsday", and it will take some time to fully unspool and rewind on one reel, imo.</p><p></p><p>I think it could actually get very serious, depending on how the game is played, or what its true intent is, sometimes world war is the only way to recover according to the current model of "productivity", it really is an age old cycle, but now it is also "globalizing".</p><p></p><p>I like to throw a curve, so I say it will "end" in "world peace", by virtue of military monopoly (and financial system monopoly globalized), not the "doomsday" many "predict". It can get very bad for certain entities and groups, national sovereignty in general, and the like, but the core will get stronger, always has. This round of consolidation may just be the one to actually install a functional true world government, imo.</p><p></p><p>The worse it looks in general, the more acceptable and hopeful world government will be, imo, people will be begging for it in the mass global populace. The stressing cycle aids that presentation and it actually is the only solution this deep in the game in human terms. Strangely the core wealth system is the one that will "recommend" itself by these kinds of serious events. (And I mean the globalizing wealth system, not the monetary, credit and financial system big wealth merely runs as symbolic models based on belief, I mean core global gold and asset OWNERSHIP. Like the one in Daniel 11:42-43, imo.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="StarTemple, post: 66796500, member: 367539"] Well the Islam religious global polarity now has the Cold War 2.0 ultimate political polarity dynamic with Russia so about all possible "bogey man" scenarios are contained in those two. China is just the cherry on top. Truly this is an astounding scale and nature of potential destabilization, I mean MASSIVE. But well see how it goes, I'm not a "doomsdayer", I think it is a cycle to world stability a number of years into the final cycle. Gauging the way this all "emerges" into the media it seems a bit "predictive" if you ask me, of the future of the two polarities actually, imo, preparing to merge into a uni-polarity by "force" if need be, and I don't mean just military force, but also financial and the quasi-spiritual. Imo the masses are so distracted the program of the play has to explained before the play begins, or no one would figure out just what they are supposed to think as these things intensify. Imo, many Americans and others need someone to outright tell them EXACTLY what to think, sort of like a human drone. Global NATO is the core entity that has goals of monopoly, which is actually logical. Whatever it is I do not think it is "doomsday", and it will take some time to fully unspool and rewind on one reel, imo. I think it could actually get very serious, depending on how the game is played, or what its true intent is, sometimes world war is the only way to recover according to the current model of "productivity", it really is an age old cycle, but now it is also "globalizing". I like to throw a curve, so I say it will "end" in "world peace", by virtue of military monopoly (and financial system monopoly globalized), not the "doomsday" many "predict". It can get very bad for certain entities and groups, national sovereignty in general, and the like, but the core will get stronger, always has. This round of consolidation may just be the one to actually install a functional true world government, imo. The worse it looks in general, the more acceptable and hopeful world government will be, imo, people will be begging for it in the mass global populace. The stressing cycle aids that presentation and it actually is the only solution this deep in the game in human terms. Strangely the core wealth system is the one that will "recommend" itself by these kinds of serious events. (And I mean the globalizing wealth system, not the monetary, credit and financial system big wealth merely runs as symbolic models based on belief, I mean core global gold and asset OWNERSHIP. Like the one in Daniel 11:42-43, imo.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
International Politics
Paul Craig Roberts: Sanctions May Lead To War
Top
Bottom