Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I think you are missing the point. Pascal’s wager is a flawed premise.
Au contraire. I didn't run; I addressed the issue directly. How is the creator of matter made of matter?
. How is the creator of matter made of matter?
To address thus the actual question: Why am I a Christian and not a Hindu?
The easy answer, I believe Christianity to be true. Whether my belief is informed by my cultural background or not, this is what I believe, but that background really doesn't matter. To dismiss the validity of something on account of the background of the person espousing it, is anyway the fallacy of Bulverism.
For I see Sin as a visceral reality. There are real injustices, real wrongs, and I cannot see these as only conventions. Some things are absolutely evil, and some superficially good things are surreptitiously so as well, depending how they are procured. This seems clear to me. Christianity addresses this, in fact harps on it, and its central act is an act of Atonement.
Hinduism doesn't address this. It often falls into pantheistic fancy or process, or Divine perspective claptrap. If these things were true, then it wouldn't matter anyway if I played the Wager, as all was god anyway, or evil actions actually 'good'. Even the Bhakti cults fall into this trap. I cannot abide excusing evil. No, Hinduism fails to address the moral life I see unfold, and in a Paschal Wager argument vis a vis a three way bet, its position is not dissimilar to the atheist one. If I considered them equally, Hinduism should not be chosen, as a stated goal is largely to escape rebirth. Moksha is sought, which the other options would have another spin of the wheel if we had chosen wrongly anyway. The very fact that I am weighing this option, means I have not as yet been liberated, so I would be reborn regardless. So nothing is lost by not choosing it.
...basically, despite all of the trumped up misrepresentation that Pascal's Wager receives from skeptics and unbelievers, it really is nothing more than a suggestion by Pascal for a person to place himself or herself into the best possible position (i.e. stand within close earshot of the Church and it's teaching) until such a time he or she finds faith. It's not a stand in for faith. And I'm not sure why Pascal's wager always gets trounced on so heavily. My guess is that no one reads the Pensees in full, so more often than not, people take his whole 'gamble' out of the full context in which he placed it.
Peace,
2PhiloVoid
Tell me, do you believe in the validity testing abilities of Scientific Method or that scientific findings and laws reflect reality? Is this not just a Western cultural construct to do so, couched in Western philosophy and history? Anyone else to follow and credit Scientific Method would inherently entail a proportion of westernisation, as to logic and philosophic precepts.It may not be reasonable to assess the validity of a god concept based on the cultural background of its believers but it is eminently reasonable to argue that a belief in the concept is a product of that culture. To argue otherwise is patently ridiculous.
Not really what I said though. I have empiric and experiential evidence of the existence of evil. Something that denies or runs completely contrary to the evidence supplied, is rightfully set aside.The remainder of your post appears to be a statement of your particular view of the world and the amazing fact that your God belief neatly coincides with your worldview and all else (to quote you) is ‘claptrap’.
One cannot escape the culture one is born into, or the forces that shaped your thought. If it is circular to agree with what I consider reasonable, then everyone is going around the magic roundabout.That argument has all the circularity of a carnival ride.
OB
I think sir, you are confused. I am a Christian, not a follower of a bronze age monolatric National religion. There is something called the fulfilment of Scripture, occuring to allow the mythopeoic landscape to exist in which the Incarnation could occur. This is anyway an involved question on punishment and justice, that I do not believe your flippant response warrants an exposition on.Do you excuse God from dictating the kids to have their skulls dashed?
I would apologise on behalf of Christian apologists everywhere, for overlooking his obvious intervention in human history, and then humbly offer him the finest bag of peanuts I could acquire in the afterlife.
I'm going to offer him peanuts.
One word: Christmas.One word
Jesus
OB
Oh, so the "elephant" isn't really an elephant? Well that answers your OP then. The Supreme Being is the Supreme Being.He appears that way to you so you can comprehend things better,
Or
He is not this is just how you are working through what it is witnessing
Or
any one of the other "Magic" reasons that people can come up with.
Oh, so the "elephant" isn't really an elephant? Well that answers your OP then. The Supreme Being is the Supreme Being.
If Pascal's wager is motivating to some, cool.
Doesn't do much for me.
The assumption that having a religion does not come at a cost, has always come across as a major hole in the augment . I always assumed it was because more people come at assuming just continuing as a Christian is not a cost.
I have never been a theist (unlike the majority of other non-believers) and converting to Christianity always seemed costly to me. The different starting positions must make you view it in a different light.
ThisWell, I was a Christian for most of my life. I simply could not buy the Christian story any longer as I gained knowledge and pretending to do so, is not something I am good at.
"No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them, and I will raise them up at the last day." John 6:44You've effectively been asked why you've chosen Christianity over any other religion and you're all running for cover.
"They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us." 1 John 2:19Well, I was a Christian for most of my life. I simply could not buy the Christian story any longer as I gained knowledge and pretending to do so, is not something I am good at.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?