Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Paradigm Shift: Holistic Darwinism VS the Selfish Gene
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joshua 1 9" data-source="post: 72018179" data-attributes="member: 376633"><p>I am still doing a study on Corning. Clearly the precise mechanism of evolution was not understood by Darwin and is still not understood today. Corning feels that single cause theories are inadequate and we need a multi-dimensional perspective. This is why he comes up with his Synergism Hypothesis that he wrote a book about. </p><p></p><p>Corning tends to look more at the social science. This requires a synthesis of social science and life science. My wife actually has her degree in Sociology, so Corning's approach makes perfect sense to her. If we were to ask what is the queen of social science: Biology or Physics, Corning would most likely say the Queen of Social Science going back to Aristotle is Politics.</p><p></p><p>Dawkins approach does nothing to explain co evolution.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joshua 1 9, post: 72018179, member: 376633"] I am still doing a study on Corning. Clearly the precise mechanism of evolution was not understood by Darwin and is still not understood today. Corning feels that single cause theories are inadequate and we need a multi-dimensional perspective. This is why he comes up with his Synergism Hypothesis that he wrote a book about. Corning tends to look more at the social science. This requires a synthesis of social science and life science. My wife actually has her degree in Sociology, so Corning's approach makes perfect sense to her. If we were to ask what is the queen of social science: Biology or Physics, Corning would most likely say the Queen of Social Science going back to Aristotle is Politics. Dawkins approach does nothing to explain co evolution. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Paradigm Shift: Holistic Darwinism VS the Selfish Gene
Top
Bottom