Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The majority of which he already had before becoming President. The president only makes $400,000 per year in salary. His benefits are the real perk of the job, not the money.I spelled Obama's name correctly.
My point, Aisy, is that Obama's net worth is calculated at over $5 million. So the question stands.
What's not true about it?And the left really believes dumb stuff like this...it gives them comfort to think they are superior.
Sarah Palin has clout with republicans because she can draw crowds and raise a lot of money. Add to that the fact that her endorsement can often move you to the front of the political line and you have someone with clout. What she lacks is credibility in regard to her own political aspirations. If she took herself off the list of potential presidential contenders, that credibility would grow. She has found her niche, and if she is smart, she will stay doing exactly what she is doing.
We have a winner!
And if the Republican party can convince her to play that part in the right races both she and they will benefit.
Except statistics prove that the more religious one is, the less educated/intelligent. The conservative evangelical christians dominate the Republican party, especially the Tea Party. Therefore, they draw in the poorly educated, older generations who believe the Earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs walked with man. Their lack of education and/or intelligence leads them to vote for like-minded candidates without caring about their lack of credentials - so long as they support their beliefs.All of it.
Except statistics prove that the more religious one is, the less educated/intelligent.
Therefore, they draw in the poorly educated, older generations who believe the Earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs walked with man. Their lack of education and/or intelligence leads them to vote for like-minded candidates without caring about their lack of credentials - so long as they support their beliefs.
Except statistics prove that the more religious one is, the less educated/intelligent. The conservative evangelical christians dominate the Republican party, especially the Tea Party. Therefore, they draw in the poorly educated, older generations who believe the Earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs walked with man. Their lack of education and/or intelligence leads them to vote for like-minded candidates without caring about their lack of credentials - so long as they support their beliefs.
So Jase you list yourself as a Messianic do this mean you are unintelligent?
Right, and the base of the democratic party--the inner city ghettos--light the world with their brilliance. Atheists may have reached the correct conclusion to a particular question, but that alone hardly qualifies them to lay claim to the title of the educated/intelligent ones. The fact that most atheists then align themselves with the political left, is all the proof you need to show that they really arent all that bright after all. In essence, your typical atheist got the first question on the exam correct, but then got every other answer wrong. That gets you an F.Except statistics prove that the more religious one is, the less educated/intelligent. The conservative evangelical christians dominate the Republican party, especially the Tea Party. Therefore, they draw in the poorly educated, older generations who believe the Earth is 6,000 years old and dinosaurs walked with man. Their lack of education and/or intelligence leads them to vote for like-minded candidates without caring about their lack of credentials - so long as they support their beliefs.
I agree that I did not say "The Iraq and Afghanistan wars cost 1 billion a day". Does it make a difference? I think you are old enough to see the cost to the taxpayer!Right that's not 1 billion a day sport.
And yet we still have regulating bodies.... Gosh if we got rid of all that regulation wonder what they are doing there?
Oh yeah that's right... there's still regulating of the banks going on.
For someone who claims to be an atheist you sure do your best to give atheists a bad name. Why don't you stop hiding behind your finger and put a cross sign instead of a head with a brainRight, and the base of the democratic party--the inner city ghettos--light the world with their brilliance. Atheists may have reached the correct conclusion to a particular question, but that alone hardly qualifies them to lay claim to the title of the educated/intelligent ones. The fact that most atheists then align themselves with the political left, is all the proof you need to show that they really arent all that bright after all. In essence, your typical atheist got the first question on the exam correct, but then got every other answer wrong. That gets you an F.
Right, and the base of the democratic party--the inner city ghettos--light the world with their brilliance. Atheists may have reached the correct conclusion to a particular question, but that alone hardly qualifies them to lay claim to the title of the educated/intelligent ones. The fact that most atheists then align themselves with the political left, is all the proof you need to show that they really arent all that bright after all. In essence, your typical atheist got the first question on the exam correct, but then got every other answer wrong. That gets you an F.
Atheist only think they have the universe and everything in it all figured out. They don't, really.
Never read books, Nathan?
Not according to your average fundie.OK, in the spirit of consistency, I will admit that post number 57 was out of line. However, there is more to Christianity and acceptance in the existence of a higher power than what is written in the one book you reference.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?