• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

jlujan69

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
4,065
210
United States
✟5,360.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
When I say "Pagan", I'm referring to those who identify themselves as such on these boards. Anyway, when I read the various posts, I happen to take note of some personal items the poster displays such as gender, religion, and age. It's just what I do. Anyway, what I noticed is that those who identify themselves as Atheists are always male. I've yet to see a female Atheist (or Agnostic, come to think of it). When it comes to Pagans, the vast majority seem to be female. So, to those Atheists on these boards, do you know many females who call themselves Atheists? For the Pagans on these forums, from what you've observed, would you say that the majority of those who share your religion are male or female?
 

HouseApe

Senior Veteran
Sep 30, 2004
2,426
188
Florida
✟3,485.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I would actually bet a majority of folks who call themselves "atheist" are male. That doesn't mean that there are not a lot of female atheists. I think women can tend to be more spiritual than men, especially in American society. And please don't accept bimbam's vitriol as indicative of atheism, as I wouldn't accept a theist's vitriol as indicative of the particular religious belief they follow.
 
Upvote 0

Whitegravity

Universal Bard
Oct 28, 2004
296
17
37
El Paso...but not for long!
Visit site
✟531.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
That isn't fair to say, sounds like a case of religious association...

I'm male, I visit this forum regularly, I'm friendly, and I'm Pagan. Well, my opinion in the matter has to do with the ratio of certain peoples that visit forums; depending on the subject will decide the gender's majority as easily as soap operas or monday night footbal; it is just a coincidence. Just because you don't Pagan males here doesn't mean we don't exist, I'm here . I can't and won't try to determine if religion has an effect on gender, in my opinion, I don't mind serving my goddess, and this is what I believe in and I'm a guy. The gender thing isn't my fault, I promise you that...

I suppose I will vouch support the Pagan male of the issue .

BB
 
Upvote 0

jlujan69

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
4,065
210
United States
✟5,360.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

Assuming you're responding to my post, I have seen male Pagans on these boards from time to time, only a few, however. As far as subject material goes, there are plenty of males and females of all religious persuasions who hold a vast array of opinions on subjects of a moral and religious nature on this forum, and still I see few male Pagans represented and no female Atheists.
I have to wonder why male Pagans and female Atheists would not want to discuss the topics their opposite gendered fellow believers (or disbelievers) like to discuss.
 
Upvote 0

Whitegravity

Universal Bard
Oct 28, 2004
296
17
37
El Paso...but not for long!
Visit site
✟531.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Oh, my apologies, I didn't quite understand your message. I communicate farely well with my religious counterparts, and they with me. I'm not sure they do not wish to participate in discussions like their male or female others, it is just a matter of them finding interest, I suppose. A good friend of mine, SquareC, and I often find eachother in the same topics because we share some common interests. You should also acknowledge that this forum is a huge community with over a thousand unique users, so it might prove a little rare to see two people in the same place often.
 
Upvote 0

SquareC

Blessed Be!
Jul 8, 2003
930
234
55
Houston, Texas
Visit site
✟24,746.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Did I hear my name?

Yes, for some reason, we seem attracted to similar topics!

I've known pretty much the same number of male Pagan as female (except in Dianic Wicca... ) over the years. I've thought on it and I think I've seen fairly equal numbers online too, including here. Volos and Arikay come to mind. Whitegravity is obviously male!

I can't say if I've known as many female atheists as male. I've known a few of each. I have noticed (once you called my attention to it..) that as far as posting here, there seem to be more males than females in the atheists. Interesting observation there.
 
Upvote 0

Hydra009

bel esprit
Oct 28, 2003
8,593
371
42
Raleigh, NC
✟25,536.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
You need to look harder. I know of quite a few female atheists here off the top of my head.

I have to wonder why male Pagans and female Atheists would not want to discuss the topics their opposite gendered fellow believers (or disbelievers) like to discuss.
Since observation #1 is false, you might want to reconsider observation #2.
 
Upvote 0

tocis

Warrior of Thor
Jul 29, 2004
2,674
119
55
Northern Germany
✟25,966.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
jlujan69 said:
to those Atheists on these boards, do you know many females who call themselves Atheists? For the Pagans on these forums, from what you've observed, would you say that the majority of those who share your religion are male or female?

No, and no (taking the role of atheist for a moment to answer the first question). Granted that I know very few such people personally, most of them are online friends... but among them, I don't notice any significant gender imbalance.
 
Upvote 0

tocis

Warrior of Thor
Jul 29, 2004
2,674
119
55
Northern Germany
✟25,966.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
jlujan69 said:
I have to wonder why male Pagans and female Atheists would not want to discuss the topics their opposite gendered fellow believers (or disbelievers) like to discuss.

I may not be the best partner in a discussion, but I am male and I am a heathen... so there.
 
Upvote 0

tocis

Warrior of Thor
Jul 29, 2004
2,674
119
55
Northern Germany
✟25,966.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
ServantofTheOne said:
possibly because most females experience childbirth and their intellect tells them that the miraculous process of life that occurs within their bodies could not have been the result of mere probability as atheists believe.

Oh please, not that old probability claim again. It has never been correct when christians claimed it, and it's no more correct when a muslim claims it.
 
Upvote 0

tocis

Warrior of Thor
Jul 29, 2004
2,674
119
55
Northern Germany
✟25,966.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
ServantofTheOne said:
what about when atheists claim it. is it more correct then.

Show me an atheist who seriously claims that probability and nothing else was involved in the "formation" of the lifeforms we can observe today and I can answer your question.
 
Upvote 0

ServantofTheOne

Well-Known Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,203
17
✟1,449.00
Faith
Muslim
tocis said:
Show me an atheist who seriously claims that probability and nothing else was involved in the "formation" of the lifeforms we can observe today and I can answer your question.

you tell me then what was the catalyst for the beginning of life?

I attended a tour given by an atheist guide on the evolution exhibit at a local museum, and he claimed that it we are the result of the roll of dice. and that if it happened all over again, we most likely would not have existed.

I asked him, that he insinuated that we are the result of one roll of a die, but in reality for an atheist/evolutionist theory to hold true we would be the result of millions if not billions sequential rolls of dice, and on each roll it would have to result in a jackpot each and everytime.

his response was that during the evolutionary cycle there were cataclysms that set the process back and another series of dice were established.

but that didn't explain no matter what cataclysmic event there would have to be millions of successive jackpots to reach the stage we are.
 
Upvote 0