Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
My point is that Radiometric dating does not tell us how old the earth is. Right now the age of the earth is established using the information we have from Hubble. This is based on the belief that the universe is expanding at a consistant rate.Which it has been, so your point would be...?
The origional composition was molten that hardened into igneous rock and granite is a igneous rock it is NOT a sedimentary rock.Molten rock hardens into igneous rock.The 'origional' earth's composition was not granitic.
My point is that Radiometric dating does not tell us how old the earth is. Right now the age of the earth is established using the information we have from Hubble. This is based on the belief that the universe is expanding at a consistant rate.
It absolutely does, and it does so by Pb/Pb dating of chondrites, which are remnants of the accretion of the inner planets.My point is that Radiometric dating does not tell us how old the earth is.
So then you agree with me that there would have been no sedimentary rocks and that the original composition of the Earth was not granitic. Fantabulous!The origional composition was molten that hardened into igneous rock and granite is a igneous rock it is NOT a sedimentary rock.
Don't give me that nonsense. I gave you the facts and you just revealed how much respect you have for facts. So you believe in that Darwinian hogwash concerning occurrences you have never observed, but you don't believe in those occurrences (i.e. Mt. St. Helens) that have been both observed and timed by empirical investigation.
You keep your childish ridicule to yourself because it means nothing to me.
Well here are far more facts for you to chew on:
"Drama in the Rocks"
I hope you will have the courage to view the entire program. I've never seen anything that blows away evolutionary 'geology' like these creationist geologists did.
I do not understand how people can believe in a Young Earth when there is Overwhelming evidence for an Old Earth. For example look at the Grand Canyon. Young Earth people say it was carved out in recent history, in the last 13,000 years. Ok, I can accept that, but look at what was carved out. The Grand Canyon is made in layers that obviously took a very long time to be formed. In fact often layers had to be broken down from a solid rock to a very fine partical, so it can be layed down as a layer. Geological evidence shows this earth has been around for a long time. The young earth theory has been shown not to be true for over 100 years now. Often it was Christians trying to show a young earth that discovered that the earth is actually very ancient.
Yes, the earth seems to be old. But the earth is young.
So, how could they both be right?
You would probably be too simple if you say they could not. There ARE other variables. Ironically, time is most likely one of them.
Is this the argument that God created the earth a few thousand years ago using "old" materials or materials that appear old?
Not so.
One important clue is the Garden of Eden. It still exists today. You tell me how is it possible.
Nor will you. Juve is our resident pseudogeologist. He presents very basic geologic knowledge and claims to be a university faculty geologist, yet is unwilling to substantiate the claim and when pressed, fails to display an integrated understanding of the geosciences.I'm sorry, I have no idea what point you are attempting to make.
Nor will you. Juve is our resident pseudogeologist. He presents very basic geologic knowledge and claims to be a university faculty geologist, yet is unwilling to substantiate the claim and when pressed, fails to display an integrated understanding of the geosciences.
He's fun to poke holes in, but your time will ultimately be wasted.
A geologist on the faculty of a university? I would never have guessed that from the posts I have seen. I have personally encountered dozens of professors of geology.
I'm sorry, I have no idea what point you are attempting to make.
I said that what I said is a critical clue to the young earth.
That is pretty true. If you see me face to face, I am just another normal one.
Too bad.
You are admitting that your posts reveal little knowledge of geology?
Once again, you are being far too cryptic to make any sense to me.
You are admitting that your posts reveal little knowledge of geology?
I am sorry. It might be so. It would have to be broken down to several steps.
Do you accept the idea that the Garden of Eden still exist today?
If your don't. Then that is it. No more argument.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?