Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Our universe contains 10 times more galaxies than we thought
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Radrook" data-source="post: 70382418" data-attributes="member: 385077"><p>It is indeed the common denominator. I once was told outright that it is the common denominator and that any attempt no matter how compelling the evidence or the argument might be would be rejected by default based on that common denominator. That isn't science nor has anything at all to do with being scientific or with the scientific method because the scientific method demands an open unbiased mind and strict objectivity. Such an attitude goes completely contrary to those two basic scientific method requirements.</p><p></p><p>The scientific method also demands a strict adherence to the principles of cogent reasoning in the formulation of hypothesis leading to theories via the inductive leap which is used to formulate a premise leading to conclusions upon which those theories are based. Atheists glibly cast such a basic requirement aside when convenient by ignoring logic and applying it only when it doesn't lead to a conclusion which they deem unacceptable-the existence of a creator or of a designing mind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Radrook, post: 70382418, member: 385077"] It is indeed the common denominator. I once was told outright that it is the common denominator and that any attempt no matter how compelling the evidence or the argument might be would be rejected by default based on that common denominator. That isn't science nor has anything at all to do with being scientific or with the scientific method because the scientific method demands an open unbiased mind and strict objectivity. Such an attitude goes completely contrary to those two basic scientific method requirements. The scientific method also demands a strict adherence to the principles of cogent reasoning in the formulation of hypothesis leading to theories via the inductive leap which is used to formulate a premise leading to conclusions upon which those theories are based. Atheists glibly cast such a basic requirement aside when convenient by ignoring logic and applying it only when it doesn't lead to a conclusion which they deem unacceptable-the existence of a creator or of a designing mind. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Our universe contains 10 times more galaxies than we thought
Top
Bottom