Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Order without Intelligence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Molal" data-source="post: 53873294" data-attributes="member: 177918"><p>Why do you consider the words of a 1600's man to be relevant to todays discussion on gravitational theory? It would appear that your reliance on such dated quotations leads you to believe they are also applicable to today's life. Indeed, are you an alchemist - divining the aetheral realm to transmutate base metals into gold? Such was the alchemist theories in the 1600's.</p><p> </p><p>They were men trying to understand the elemental nature of the physical world; conflated in their ideologies, they supposed supernatural forces for simple physical processes.</p><p> </p><p>If a neurosurgeon said 2+2=4, I would congratulate him for his mathematical ability. If he suggested it equaled 5, I would correct him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Molal, post: 53873294, member: 177918"] Why do you consider the words of a 1600's man to be relevant to todays discussion on gravitational theory? It would appear that your reliance on such dated quotations leads you to believe they are also applicable to today's life. Indeed, are you an alchemist - divining the aetheral realm to transmutate base metals into gold? Such was the alchemist theories in the 1600's. They were men trying to understand the elemental nature of the physical world; conflated in their ideologies, they supposed supernatural forces for simple physical processes. If a neurosurgeon said 2+2=4, I would congratulate him for his mathematical ability. If he suggested it equaled 5, I would correct him. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Order without Intelligence
Top
Bottom