Cunha et al. (2006) said:Five milliliters of blood were withdrawn from each subject by venipuncture into a free-anticoagulant vacuum tube. The blood was immediately centrifuged at 3000 × g for 5 min, and serum was kept frozen at −80 ◦ C until assayed. BDNF serum levels were measured with sandwich-ELISA, using a commercial kit according to the manufacturers instructions (Chemicon, USA). Briefly, microtiter plates (96-well flat-bottom) were coated for 24 h with the samples diluted 1:2 in sample diluents and stan- dard curve ranged from 7.8 to 500pg of BNDF. Plates were then washed four times with wash buffer, added monoclonal anti-BNDF rabbit antibody (diluted 1:1000 with sample diluents), and incubated for 3h at room temperature. After washing, a second incubation with anti-rabbit antibody peroxidase conjugated (diluted 1:1000) for 1 h at room temperature was carried out. After addition of streptavidin-enzyme, substrate and stop solution, the amount of BDNF was determined (absorbance set in 450 nm). The standard curve demonstrates a direct relation- ship between optical density (OD) and BDNF concentration. Total protein was measured by Lowrys method using bovine serum albumin as a standard.
*rubs forehead tiredly*
Ok, so its not like I'm stupid, I know what they are doing here. But why, exactly, would I ever want to use bovine serum albumin as a standard in a human serum immunoassay?
Or is this just a place where I need to
at Cunha et al.?