Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
" Facile" is not the same as " in depthOver millions of years many places have once been submerged but that is not the same thing as a global flood.
Did we forget to read: "closed up the area with flesh."
As a TE I am sure you do not want to know how I understand that verse.
Although if you believe that everything happened in an instant then why would it matter how God made Eve from Adam?
What I think is that there was no Biblical Adam.
Is that when your watch stopped ticking?
Do you understand what it means when they say time is relative?
Einstein determined ...
Grand canyon!
Clams on Everest!
Flash frozen mammoths in Siberia!
I'm looking more at surface evidence like scablands from rushing water, the Columbia River Gorge type if geology, erosion of hills which have a distinct rushing water type of geology, giant current ripples, water level flood marks on hills and mountains, locations, and size as well as types of loads of flood sediments left behind, source of flood water, those types of visible evidence.I think we are probably saying the same thing. Most (all?) flood arguments I have seen attribute the bulk of the Phanerozoic (Cambrian forwards) deposits to the flood. So, in that sense, ground level goes way down the geological column. That's how they (claim to) explain the distribution of different fossils within the column.
There's no way to visibally hide a water event that huge and angery.
How are any of these evidence of a global flood?Would you like to look at Florida, the Pacific Islands or the Rockey mountains for evidence of a global flood?
Nope. The geology shows some, like Mt Everest are the result of plates crashing together pushing underwater land up into mountains. I know the argument of marine creatures found on Mt. Everest. But those who argue that those are from the Noah's Flood would have to explain the sticky problem that they are from the Ordovican Period, 450 Million years ago.We are told that the mountains were covered, are we not?
?What the Bible does not talk about is that much of the water was frozen.
I know not to you. But that means nothing to me.You play the "there's no way" card often.
As if it means something.
Scientific illiteracy is very nearly universal when itI'm looking more at surface evidence like scablands from rushing water, the Columbia River Gorge type if geology, erosion of hills which have a distinct rushing water type of geology, giant current ripples, water level flood marks on hills and mountains, locations, and size as well as types of loads of flood sediments left behind, source of flood water, those types of visible evidence.
The Ice Age Flood happened 12,000 years ago and there is still lots of visible evidence everywhere. If, and that's a pretty big "IF", a Global flood actually happened a mere 4000 years ago, all of the Ice Age flood evidence would all be washed away by the imagined proceding world wide flood. Not only that, but we would see clear evidance of that flood everywhere we looked. There's no way to visibally hide a water event that huge and angery.
Washington scablands after Ice Age Floods:
Channeled Scablands
Video of ripples left behind from Ice Age Flood:
Columbia River Gorge:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/recmain/crgnsa/recreation
A droll side note is that anyone could manage such monstrous self deception as to think that via the absurd route of no study at all, they know more than every scientist on earth.
There are those who argue that Pangea was not a flood. One way or the other the world was still destroyed. Clearly the fountains of the deep and the windows of Heaven were effected. Dinosaurs died off while primates and mammals began to grow and expand. Even at the time the sky was pink and not blue as it is now. The dinosaurs in the Rocky Mountains died in a flood and are found in flood deposits.How are any of these evidence of a global flood?
People know what they know but they do not know what they think they know.Smart cookies, ain't they?
Of course, you are right. I had overlooked that set of alleged "evidence". As @Astrid remarks somehow certain people imagine themselves endowed with a knowledge about the tale told by rocks without having intimately studied those rocks.I'm looking more at surface evidence like scablands from rushing water, the Columbia River Gorge type if geology, erosion of hills which have a distinct rushing water type of geology, giant current ripples, water level flood marks on hills and mountains, locations, and size as well as types of loads of flood sediments left behind, source of flood water, those types of visible evidence.
The Ice Age Flood happened 12,000 years ago and there is still lots of visible evidence everywhere. If, and that's a pretty big "IF", a Global flood actually happened a mere 4000 years ago, all of the Ice Age flood evidence would all be washed away by the imagined proceding world wide flood. Not only that, but we would see clear evidance of that flood everywhere we looked. There's no way to visibally hide a water event that huge and angery.
Washington scablands after Ice Age Floods:
Channeled Scablands
Video of ripples left behind from Ice Age Flood:
Columbia River Gorge:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/recmain/crgnsa/recreation
There are those who argue that Pangea was not a flood. One way or the other the world was still destroyed. Clearly the fountains of the deep and the windows of Heaven were effected. Dinosaurs died off while primates and mammals began to grow and expand. Even at the time the sky was pink and not blue as it is now. The dinosaurs in the Rocky Mountains died in a flood and are found in flood deposits.
People know what they know but they do not know what they think they know.
I'm seriously clueless about Russian poetry. Is there such a thing?Of course, you are right. I had overlooked that set of alleged "evidence". As @Astrid remarks somehow certain people imagine themselves endowed with a knowledge about the tale told by rocks without having intimately studied those rocks.
There is nothing wrong with ignorance, since we are all ignorant of vastly more than we have knowledge of. The trick is to recognise, for ourselves, what aspects of the world fit into which category: ignorant of/knowledgeable about. For example, you will never see me commenting, with any confidence, on embroidery in 13th century Madrid. (The closest I can get is to tell you that the famed Bayeux tapestry, located in Normandy, is not a tapestry but an embroidery. Quite a different matter!)
That's quite a bunch of claims. Do you have any evidence for any of it?There are those who argue that Pangea was not a flood. One way or the other the world was still destroyed. Clearly the fountains of the deep and the windows of Heaven were effected. Dinosaurs died off while primates and mammals began to grow and expand. Even at the time the sky was pink and not blue as it is now. The dinosaurs in the Rocky Mountains died in a flood and are found in flood deposits.
A. Provide a source for your claim that Rocky Mountain dinos died in a flood.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?