Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't really care what reasons you have sex... I'd just prefer that you not kill your baby if and when you (or yours) get knocked up.If you're having sex because you find it enjoyable, you're doing it wrong.
I am almost never okay with the killing of a child.... born or un-born.I actually know a woman who got pregnant after her husband got a vasectomy. So those "other ways of lessening the odds" can still lead to pregnancy. Are you still not okay with a child-free couple getting an abortion if that happened to them?
Plus, not every doctor is okay with giving a man a vasectomy unless he's a) over 30, or b) has at least one child already. So are you saying that men under 30 who want to remain child-free should just never have sex with their wife at all?
*sigh* It's pro-choice, not pro-abortion, since we're perfectly fine with women choosing to put their child up for adoption or choosing to become a mother. We don't try to promote abortion over the two other choices.Trust me... this one isn't that heated
but, did you know that you have the exact same views as those that used to be Pro-Abortion?
So you don't care about people, then, you only care about fetuses. Wow. Well isn't that just lovely of you. (Sarcasm.)I am almost never okay with the killing of a child.... born or un-born.
Makes me wonder if some Christians think that [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] are "evil."
I don't really care what reasons you have sex... I'd just prefer that you not kill your baby if and when you (or yours) get knocked up.
*sigh* It's pro-choice, not pro-abortion, since we're perfectly fine with women choosing to put their child up for adoption or choosing to become a mother. We don't try to promote abortion over the two other choices.
I was just making an observation that both have the same views, which is true. You see, I'm old enough to remember when they changed their name.*sigh* It's pro-choice, not pro-abortion, since we're perfectly fine with women choosing to put their child up for adoption or choosing to become a mother. We don't try to promote abortion over the two other choices.
And you just contradicted yourself in back-to-back sentences.Watersmoon 110
Your wrong. The inalienable right to life is not conditional on location. Its to keep one alive from unwarrented death by people. Surely this is so.
The organs and avortion is not the same as I explained.
The right to bodily integrity can not overrule the right to life.
Of course there is. Consider it as under the liberty heading. You are attempting to take liberty from another human based on your opinion.The bodily one is cancelled by the baby having the same right. There is no such right as such anyways.
Ever hear of self-defense?Bodily rights could never be used to justify killing another person.
Wrong. It is based on value. The mother's life and liberty are seen as more important than the 'child's'.Abortion is based in law on the denial kills a person at all.
And you need to do better if you want to persuade people that believe an actual is more valuable than a potential.You got to do better if you want o persuade those who believe abortion kills a person.
Wrong. See pro-abortion would mean that one is in favor of aborting. Most people are not. Pro-choice, however, means that one is in favor of keeping it the woman's choice. Huge difference.I was just making an observation that both have the same views, which is true.
I remember when some racial epitaphs were considered okay in certain company. Things change.You see, I'm old enough to remember when they changed their name.
Well, nowadays, they both mean different things. I already explained what "pro-choice" means, and "pro-abortion" means that you only want women to get abortions and you don't want them to put their child up for adoption or choose motherhood. Now do you understand how "pro-choice" doesn't mean the same thing as "pro-abortion" in this day and age?I was just making an observation that both have the same views, which is true. You see, I'm old enough to remember when they changed their name.
Whatever makes you feel better.... lolWrong. See pro-abortion would mean that one is in favor of aborting. Most people are not. Pro-choice, however, means that one is in favor of keeping it the woman's choice. Huge difference.
The only reason to call someone 'pro-abortion' is to appeal to emotion and attempt to denigrate your opposition. It is no different than someone calling you anti-choice or a misogynist.
I remember when some racial epitaphs were considered okay in certain company. Things change.
Of coarse I care about people. Why else would I want to stop baby killing.So you don't care about people, then, you only care about fetuses. Wow. Well isn't that just lovely of you. (Sarcasm.)
Little hint: just because you consider an unthinking, unfeeling, unknowing first-trimester fetus to be "a person" doesn't mean that it actually is a person. Your opinion is not fact, you know.Of coarse I care about people. Why else would I want to stop baby killing.
So, then, do you think that we should go back to the original U.S. definition of marriage: a union between one white man and one white woman? If not, then why not? You are against changing the definitions of words, aren't you?Whatever makes you feel better.... lol
At the time when Pro-Abortionist changed their name to Pro-Choice, they had the same views. By your definition in today's standards, there is no such thing as Pro-Abortion. The stance is the same. There was only a name change. But thats okay.... whatever makes you feel better about being okay with killing un-born babies.
Nor is yours.Little hint: just because you consider an unthinking, unfeeling, unknowing first-trimester fetus to be "a person" doesn't mean that it actually is a person. Your opinion is not fact, you know.
When did I ever say (or imply) that it was?Nor is yours.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?