Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
On DNA percent differences between taxa and YEC timelines
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark Quayle" data-source="post: 76252425" data-attributes="member: 410020"><p>My point, I guess, extracts from a different source than yours. You rely on science for truth, or at least you try to, or you try to think you do. I admit I don't know the truth, but I rely on God.</p><p></p><p>I don't need a preponderance of scientifically direct evidence to believe what God says is true. You do. (Yet you function all day long without it for lack of time, because it is practical to do so.)</p><p></p><p>"Maybe things worked differently" isn't unscientific, nor is it meant to be authoritative. It is only an expression of skepticism, curiosity and imagination, which are scientifically prudent on the part of anyone. </p><p></p><p>As for miracles, yes, the whole question is moot, unless the miracles happened within natural law. Again: IF First Cause, then what we consider natural is also miracle. But you are talking about temporal intervention, I think, which he can do at any stage along the way of natural sequence.</p><p></p><p> Is more than one pair of alleles not possible within a heterozygous individual? Or is heterozygosity the only source of diversity between individuals?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark Quayle, post: 76252425, member: 410020"] My point, I guess, extracts from a different source than yours. You rely on science for truth, or at least you try to, or you try to think you do. I admit I don't know the truth, but I rely on God. I don't need a preponderance of scientifically direct evidence to believe what God says is true. You do. (Yet you function all day long without it for lack of time, because it is practical to do so.) "Maybe things worked differently" isn't unscientific, nor is it meant to be authoritative. It is only an expression of skepticism, curiosity and imagination, which are scientifically prudent on the part of anyone. As for miracles, yes, the whole question is moot, unless the miracles happened within natural law. Again: IF First Cause, then what we consider natural is also miracle. But you are talking about temporal intervention, I think, which he can do at any stage along the way of natural sequence. Is more than one pair of alleles not possible within a heterozygous individual? Or is heterozygosity the only source of diversity between individuals? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
On DNA percent differences between taxa and YEC timelines
Top
Bottom