Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Oh boy - I wondered what this whole Mar A Lago thing was about
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ana the Ist" data-source="post: 76863180" data-attributes="member: 302807"><p>Is it?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>To my knowledge, nuclear codes aren't held solely by the president. An attempt to share them would likely result in his imprisonment as the other party holding codes would require it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, as far as the CIA goes...I would imagine the safeguard is the CIA itself. The president can request the names, and the CIA would ask why, and if there's no need to know or suspicion the president intends to disclose that information.....he would probably receive a sheet heavily redacted that lacked the information requested.</p><p></p><p>At that point, before the director gets replaced, I'd hope that Congress moves quickly to remove the president.</p><p></p><p>If the president wants to replace them....the Director should make every effort to destroy that information.</p><p></p><p>That's an ideal though. In reality, the Director has a family and it's easier to invent a reason to burn a foreign agent than quit his job and find a new one. The entire list would require a pretty significant amount of time....and unfortunately for the director, it would be self defeating. He would do better to refuse, because arguably, no one would work under him afterwards.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ana the Ist, post: 76863180, member: 302807"] Is it? To my knowledge, nuclear codes aren't held solely by the president. An attempt to share them would likely result in his imprisonment as the other party holding codes would require it. Well, as far as the CIA goes...I would imagine the safeguard is the CIA itself. The president can request the names, and the CIA would ask why, and if there's no need to know or suspicion the president intends to disclose that information.....he would probably receive a sheet heavily redacted that lacked the information requested. At that point, before the director gets replaced, I'd hope that Congress moves quickly to remove the president. If the president wants to replace them....the Director should make every effort to destroy that information. That's an ideal though. In reality, the Director has a family and it's easier to invent a reason to burn a foreign agent than quit his job and find a new one. The entire list would require a pretty significant amount of time....and unfortunately for the director, it would be self defeating. He would do better to refuse, because arguably, no one would work under him afterwards. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Oh boy - I wondered what this whole Mar A Lago thing was about
Top
Bottom