Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Oh boy - I wondered what this whole Mar A Lago thing was about
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ana the Ist" data-source="post: 76862857" data-attributes="member: 302807"><p>Aka whatsboutism....aka the same thing everyone on here does most of the time.</p><p></p><p>It's a problem of consistency. I genuinely didn't care that Hillary Clinton wasn't prosecuted. I know she violated the law and policies probably 1000s of times over her time running the State Department. I know that by her own admission to violating these rules and the subsequent attempt of covering them up....it would have been completely justifiable to throw her in prison for the rest of her life.</p><p></p><p>Trump didn't do that though....despite calling for it during his campaign. He appears to have let it slide. Ultimately, if she wanted to use that information for illegal purposes or personal gain....she didn't need to have her own copies. She's reasonably bright. I'm certain she remembers plenty of valuable information. There's no evidence she did any of that though...to my knowledge. </p><p></p><p>As president, Trump had access to like 100 times that information? 1000 times? He didn't take all of his intel through an unsecured private email (though I remember some people around him had in some limited manner)....he had some documents that may or may not have some value....I'm assuming he had legitimate access to them. As the final authority on such matters...it's hard to think of what exactly would be an instance where he'd be in violation. </p><p></p><p>So that's the problem. If you weren't howling over Hillary violating standards she was supposed to follow....you really shouldn't change your position in this instance. If it's just documents and not some misuse of them that amounts to a crime....this shouldn't result in even any charges.</p><p></p><p>If Trump used the information for personal gain or at risk of national security....that's something else. The problem is that people will need to see that. They won't believe in a document with a bunch of blacked out lines.</p><p></p><p>To use the FBI, DOJ (who already has a corrupt reputation under Biden) or literally any agency for the purpose of gaining office or removing political opponents is....arguably....the most tyrannical thing I've seen either party do in my lifetime. </p><p></p><p>It's flirting with civil war.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ana the Ist, post: 76862857, member: 302807"] Aka whatsboutism....aka the same thing everyone on here does most of the time. It's a problem of consistency. I genuinely didn't care that Hillary Clinton wasn't prosecuted. I know she violated the law and policies probably 1000s of times over her time running the State Department. I know that by her own admission to violating these rules and the subsequent attempt of covering them up....it would have been completely justifiable to throw her in prison for the rest of her life. Trump didn't do that though....despite calling for it during his campaign. He appears to have let it slide. Ultimately, if she wanted to use that information for illegal purposes or personal gain....she didn't need to have her own copies. She's reasonably bright. I'm certain she remembers plenty of valuable information. There's no evidence she did any of that though...to my knowledge. As president, Trump had access to like 100 times that information? 1000 times? He didn't take all of his intel through an unsecured private email (though I remember some people around him had in some limited manner)....he had some documents that may or may not have some value....I'm assuming he had legitimate access to them. As the final authority on such matters...it's hard to think of what exactly would be an instance where he'd be in violation. So that's the problem. If you weren't howling over Hillary violating standards she was supposed to follow....you really shouldn't change your position in this instance. If it's just documents and not some misuse of them that amounts to a crime....this shouldn't result in even any charges. If Trump used the information for personal gain or at risk of national security....that's something else. The problem is that people will need to see that. They won't believe in a document with a bunch of blacked out lines. To use the FBI, DOJ (who already has a corrupt reputation under Biden) or literally any agency for the purpose of gaining office or removing political opponents is....arguably....the most tyrannical thing I've seen either party do in my lifetime. It's flirting with civil war. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Oh boy - I wondered what this whole Mar A Lago thing was about
Top
Bottom