Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Oh boy - I wondered what this whole Mar A Lago thing was about
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Valletta" data-source="post: 76860599" data-attributes="member: 430841"><p>Once records are "accessioned" to NARA that means custody is transferred and NARA controls them. NARA also holds records that are not accessioned, they merely hold records for an agency. For instance, the CIA owns groups of records at NARA, the CIA actually has a declassification officer there and a request for those records to NARA would end up with the CIA officer. So NARA does not control or own records until those records are transferred to their control. Classified records remain classified until the proper authority declassifies those records. It was Sandy Berger, former advisor to President Clinton, who had stuffed records down his pants and got caught, yet he was not prosecuted. The statement by NARA does not address whether Obama kept any records that were never turned over to NARA.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Valletta, post: 76860599, member: 430841"] Once records are "accessioned" to NARA that means custody is transferred and NARA controls them. NARA also holds records that are not accessioned, they merely hold records for an agency. For instance, the CIA owns groups of records at NARA, the CIA actually has a declassification officer there and a request for those records to NARA would end up with the CIA officer. So NARA does not control or own records until those records are transferred to their control. Classified records remain classified until the proper authority declassifies those records. It was Sandy Berger, former advisor to President Clinton, who had stuffed records down his pants and got caught, yet he was not prosecuted. The statement by NARA does not address whether Obama kept any records that were never turned over to NARA. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Oh boy - I wondered what this whole Mar A Lago thing was about
Top
Bottom