Putting aside the core issue that the recent comments were about I just wanted to comment on some of the underlying assumptions in the comments.
Christian doctrine is that we are all abnormal in two senses.
None of us are now naturally what God intended us to be, so in that sense we are all naturally abnormal.
God expexts us to aim to be better then we currently are, so in that sense we all ought to aim to be abnornal not our natural selves.
What is natural is not necessarily good and what is good is not always natural. I can't help feel that Rev Dr Rudd's arguement was that if something is natural it must therefore be good.
Christian doctrine is that we are all abnormal in two senses.
None of us are now naturally what God intended us to be, so in that sense we are all naturally abnormal.
God expexts us to aim to be better then we currently are, so in that sense we all ought to aim to be abnornal not our natural selves.
What is natural is not necessarily good and what is good is not always natural. I can't help feel that Rev Dr Rudd's arguement was that if something is natural it must therefore be good.