Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
I see you neatly and very discretely implied the strawman again. I didn't claim the universe was the evidence. The beginning of the universe was the claim.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You really think this is what the OP was looking for? It's UTTERLY meaningless, because the universe's existence, in your rationale, supports any and all claims of creation, even clearly fictitious ones like Bob created the universe.
Your evidence is completely inert.
I see you neatly and very discretely implied the strawman again. I didn't claim the universe was the evidence. The beginning of the universe was the claim.
I see you neatly and very discretely implied the strawman again. I didn't claim the universe was the evidence. The beginning of the universe was the claim.
I see you neatly and very discretely implied the strawman again. I didn't claim the universe was the evidence. The beginning of the universe was the claim.
You just don't want to be responsible to Leprechauns, so you ignore the objective evidence for their existence.
You're making a categorical mistake.
Put it this way. The existence of a house points to a builder.
I hope you realize all of you that there are others that are looking on in the wings and while you are all giving each other high fives in cyberspace your intellectual dishonesty is showing. You might be getting confirmation from your fellow atheists but it is glaringly obvious to others that it is due to your bias against the conclusion that is at fault here.
I hope you realize all of you that there are others that are looking on in the wings and while you are all giving each other high fives in cyberspace your intellectual dishonesty is showing. You might be getting confirmation from your fellow atheists but it is glaringly obvious to others that it is due to your bias against the conclusion that is at fault here.
I hope you realize all of you that there are others that are looking on in the wings and while you are all giving each other high fives in cyberspace your intellectual dishonesty is showing. You might be getting confirmation from your fellow atheists but it is glaringly obvious to others that it is due to your bias against the conclusion that is at fault here.
Really? Can you honestly not see how your "evidence" carries no weight, when it can ALSO be used to support clearly fictional claims?
Yes, so why do you reject Leprechauns when there is obvious objective evidence in the form of rainbows? Houses point to a builder, and rainbows point to a rainbow maker.
I hope you realize all of you that there are others that are looking on in the wings and while you are all giving each other high fives in cyberspace your intellectual dishonesty is showing. You might be getting confirmation from your fellow atheists but it is glaringly obvious to others that it is due to your bias against the conclusion that is at fault here.
I hope you realize all of you that there are others that are looking on in the wings and while you are all giving each other high fives in cyberspace your intellectual dishonesty is showing. You might be getting confirmation from your fellow atheists but it is glaringly obvious to others that it is due to your bias against the conclusion that is at fault here.
Once, you never cease to amaze me.
Bias on who's part again?
Psychology Today could do a 4 part series on the content of this thread alone.
It is even stranger to accuse us of bias. We are applying the same logic to all claimed deities and supernatural beings without bias. We are then told that we should only apply this logic to the Judeo-Christian God and not to anything else, otherwise we are biased.
I think we have landed in Bizzaro world.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?