Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
These are the key points.
Evidence can be both objective and subjective, depending on what it is relating to. The claim and conclusion are linked to the classification of the evidence.
The OP was asking for objective evidence that is objective with respect to God...not simply objective to ANYTHING.
That's what it looks like. Although, I would go a bit further with your analogy and say whereas a dead body (any body) with three gunshots is evidence for a murder (any murder), a universe (any universe) is not evidence for a deity (any deity).
The rainbow exists. It is an objective subject. There is evidence that rainbows exist. So I assume that you don't disagree.
The conclusion or the claim is subjective. It says that Leprechauns make them.
Its not that I don't see your problem with what I am claiming. But what I am trying to show here is that it is not the evidence that you are having a problem with. It is the claim and the conclusion.
What is your definition of "objective".
Information based on facts that can be proved through analysis, measurement, observation, and other such means of research.
What the?? Objective evidence DIRECTLY supports a claim. Subjective evidence circumstantially supports a claim.
IF God exists as I claim, it is evidence that supports Him.
There you go. Now you understand why the existence of the universe is not objective evidence of God
The claim that your conclusion is supported by objective evidence is clearly false.
If Leprechauns exist, then rainbows are evidence that supports them.
I asked a question. Who else? Who can create a universe? I proposed God can and bhsmte seemed to agree. I would add God and only God can. So if God can then the existence of the universe is strong evidence.
Correct!!!
I think you're starting to understand.
As has been pointed amply pointed out, you have no reason to assert your god over any other god or thing, "did it."
The claim was that it had a beginning. The Christian claims that the universe must have a beginning to support God's existence. That is the claim.
How? I mean you can clearly claim that there is not sufficient evidence to support such a claim but what you are saying is false. How do you claim the conclusion is false.
That's the entire point! How do you keep missing this?!
There is no more evidence to support Leprechaun's make rainbows than there is Christian god made universe.
I do have reason. That is the point of the exercise. There is objective evidence that supports my claim. You may disagree with the claim and feel it is in error, but then we have to go on and see if I have reason to make the claim.
If Bob exists, as I claim, it is evidence that supports him.
I do have reason. That is the point of the exercise. There is objective evidence that supports my claim. You may disagree with the claim and feel it is in error, but then we have to go on and see if I have reason to make the claim.
Once, if it hasn't sunk in yet why your conclusion has no objective connection to support your claim, you never will.
Therefore, it appears your efforts here are more to convince yourself and to protect your conclusions, which have been shown to seriously flawed.
In your subjective opinion...correct?
You and I are ok on the points. You agree that the evidence is objective, you just feel it is insufficient to provide support to my claim. That is an honest assessment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?