Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Obama supporters view TEA party same security threat as radical Islam
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Billnew" data-source="post: 63453967" data-attributes="member: 33389"><p>Lets make sure we know what we're discussing:</p><p>TEA=Taxed enough already, believe goverment needs to limit spending to what it brings in and not raise taxes, and is peacefully vocal about this issue. <strong>Accused</strong> of hinting at threats and making racist statements even though no one has claimed the reward for proof of racist statements.</p><p> </p><p>Occupy (move on) Wallstreet: Believes goverment or the people should punish or penalize corp for making a profit, and want to force corp. to give more money/benefits to the worker no matter what it does to company profit. Groups under this name have actually rioted, blocked production, shut down businesses, caused severe damage to personal property of random people(poor or rich alike), crimes related to this group: Rape, arson, rioting, promoting public unrest, destruction of public property, destruction of private property, hendering public transport.</p><p>Which group is more terrorist like?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Old ways of thinking are more dangerous then people shooting, killing, destroying buildings? Thinking and speaking is more dangerous then acting violently?</p><p>ok. Just checking.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite234" alt=":thumbsup:" title="Thumbs Up :thumbsup:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":thumbsup:" /></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Unlike Move on Wall-street and terrorists who have actually acted out with violence.</p><p>Some isolated individauls, hinted at possible violence in a few nationwide protests.</p><p></p><p>Some Move on(occupy) Wall street groups did acts of violence, destroyed personal property of others, and rioted, so I would say they are more of a terror group then the Tea Party. </p><p> </p><p>I would also say, some groups did no violence and acted much like the Tea party in their protest, I support peaceful protest on all sides.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite234" alt=":thumbsup:" title="Thumbs Up :thumbsup:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":thumbsup:" /></p><p> </p><p></p><p><span style="color: red">1.</span><span style="color: black"> 26% of Obama supporters think peaceful protesting is more dangerous then violent attacks of radical islamists, so yes. It does show its a sign that those people are "crazy".</span></p><p>Can you show a link to right wingers that believe lefties are plotting with radical Islamists? There are some that still think Obama is a Muslim, but I don't think there is 26% of right wingers that believe the left plot with the Islamists.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Billnew, post: 63453967, member: 33389"] Lets make sure we know what we're discussing: TEA=Taxed enough already, believe goverment needs to limit spending to what it brings in and not raise taxes, and is peacefully vocal about this issue. [B]Accused[/B] of hinting at threats and making racist statements even though no one has claimed the reward for proof of racist statements. Occupy (move on) Wallstreet: Believes goverment or the people should punish or penalize corp for making a profit, and want to force corp. to give more money/benefits to the worker no matter what it does to company profit. Groups under this name have actually rioted, blocked production, shut down businesses, caused severe damage to personal property of random people(poor or rich alike), crimes related to this group: Rape, arson, rioting, promoting public unrest, destruction of public property, destruction of private property, hendering public transport. Which group is more terrorist like? Old ways of thinking are more dangerous then people shooting, killing, destroying buildings? Thinking and speaking is more dangerous then acting violently? ok. Just checking.:thumbsup: Unlike Move on Wall-street and terrorists who have actually acted out with violence. Some isolated individauls, hinted at possible violence in a few nationwide protests. Some Move on(occupy) Wall street groups did acts of violence, destroyed personal property of others, and rioted, so I would say they are more of a terror group then the Tea Party. I would also say, some groups did no violence and acted much like the Tea party in their protest, I support peaceful protest on all sides.:thumbsup: [COLOR=red]1.[/COLOR][COLOR=black] 26% of Obama supporters think peaceful protesting is more dangerous then violent attacks of radical islamists, so yes. It does show its a sign that those people are "crazy".[/COLOR] Can you show a link to right wingers that believe lefties are plotting with radical Islamists? There are some that still think Obama is a Muslim, but I don't think there is 26% of right wingers that believe the left plot with the Islamists. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Obama supporters view TEA party same security threat as radical Islam
Top
Bottom