• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

O That the Atheist....

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,026
18,923
✟1,502,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
“Balderdash and shenanigans” - me
 
Upvote 0

Kokavkrystallos

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2024
1,141
645
Farmington
✟55,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Widowed
“Balderdash and shenanigans” - me

LOL!

(It is just truth be told, and since a lot of you don't like to read Bible text, I happened to have this little booklet here that's also online where that portion contains no Bible text but relates Biblical truth

It is neither nonsense, or mischievous - but I like your choice of words...)
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
23,182
17,238
55
USA
✟436,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat

What was the point of that? What does this preaching have to do with this thread (or anything)? I don't even know who George Whitefeld is or care.
 
Upvote 0

Kokavkrystallos

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2024
1,141
645
Farmington
✟55,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Widowed
What was the point of that? What does this preaching have to do with this thread (or anything)? I don't even know who George Whitefeld is or care.

He was one of the original Methodists. Mid 1700's. That message was to unbelievers. That would equate to Atheists as Atheists by definition are unbelievers.

What will you all do when in the end you find out death is not a blinking out of existence, you stand before a holy God and Jesus who shed His blood for atonement of sin, and rose from the dead, and that you all were offered this free gift of salvation, but refused to take it?

What then shall you say? There is nothing you can do, except weeping and gnashing of teeth.

I know many don't believe that, but no amount of unbelief will make it go away.

The day is coming: it is coming for everyone - either at death , or when Christ returns again, and every eye shall see Him when He comes on the clouds of heaven with great power and glory. All will fall at His feet, either willingly, or unwillingly.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
23,182
17,238
55
USA
✟436,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
He was one of the original Methodists. Mid 1700's. That message was to unbelievers. That would equate to Atheists as Atheists by definition are unbelievers.
At least you know what an atheist is. (Some on here don't or refuse to know. Sigh.) As a non-believer I saw nothing of value in that sermon, so I stopped reading it.
I did accept and then I walked away. I'm not worried in the slightest.
If only you had something more compelling than claims, but nothing you present here is anything but a claim.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,501
4,846
82
Goldsboro NC
✟276,659.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Because
1. There is no evidence which requires mind-body dualism to explain it.
2. There is no need of such an explanation. Not even Christian doctrine requires it.
 
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

Kokavkrystallos

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2024
1,141
645
Farmington
✟55,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Widowed

Ah, but the Word of God is the claim, for God does not lie, and His prophecies are true. Jesus came exactly as predicted hundreds, even thousands of years before, by at least 300 prophecies. The odds of even 8 of the prophecies being correct is like one in 100, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, or 10 to the 17th.
And then there's all the Creation, the matter of earth, the sun, the planets, the stars, etc. - Came from ????
 
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

[redacted]
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
23,026
18,923
✟1,502,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Likely something similar to what you would if you found yourself before another displeased deity.
 
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
23,182
17,238
55
USA
✟436,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Ah, but the Word of God is the claim, for God does not lie,
So you claim. I see no reason to buy that claim for it is a claim that these words are those of a deity and I see no reason to take that claim seriously.
and His prophecies are true. Jesus came exactly as predicted hundreds, even thousands of years before, by at least 300 prophecies. The odds of even 8 of the prophecies being correct is like one in 100, 000, 000, 000, 000, 000, or 10 to the 17th.
Vague prophesies "fulfilled" later? Not even sure how you would calculate the "odds" even if you accepted the fulfillment.
And then there's all the Creation, the matter of earth, the sun, the planets, the stars, etc. - Came from ????
Go over to the science board and ask this question. We will be glad to tell you. It's well known.
 
Upvote 0

Kokavkrystallos

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2024
1,141
645
Farmington
✟55,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Widowed

Not vague. Foretold the method by which he'd be crucified, long before crucifixion was a method of execution. Foretold the town he was born in.
He'd be born of a virgin. He'd be called out of Egypt. His ministry would begin in Galilee, Messiah would be preceded by a forerunner of a man who was a voice crying in the wilderness, Jerusalem will rejoice when Messiah comes in riding on a donkey, He'd be betrayed for 30 pieces of silver, none of his bones would be broken at His sacrifice, his clothing would be divided, but they would cast lots for his coat. They would give him vinegar and gall on the cross, Messiah will usher in a new covenant, children would be killed as a result of his birth.

ALL of these were fulfilled by Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Son of the Living God.

Now you might say He himself could have fulfilled them by knowing them, but that's only a few - such as riding into Jerusalem on a Donkey, and beginning His ministry in Galilee.

But, no way could He consciously fulfil things like where he was born, the oppressor ordering the children killed, how He would die, no bone broken, John the Baptist crying in the wilderness, Judas betraying for 30 pieces of silver, etc

These are not vague Nostradamus type prophecies. These are the very words of Yahweh, the LORD God of Hosts.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
23,182
17,238
55
USA
✟436,504.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Are these really prophecy? How many did the gospel writers add to the story to make it look like fulfilled prophesy?
Or the writers could.
That "wilderness" thing is very vague. None of this is convincing to those that don't accept the truthfulness of the gospels a priori.
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,762
6,319
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,154,432.00
Faith
Atheist
He'd be called out of Egypt.
Are these really prophecy? How many did the gospel writers add to the story to make it look like fulfilled prophesy?
This is a great question. Generally, the footnotes show that this is thought to be from Hosea 11:1 which says
When Israel was a child, I loved him,
and out of Egypt I called my son.​
which explicitly says "Israel" ... not messiah, not son of man, not son of God ... nothing. How is this prophecy?

Add to that the context: Hosea 11:1-2

1) When Israel was a child, I loved him,
and out of Egypt I called my son.
2) But the more they were called,
the more they went away from me.[a]
They sacrificed to the Baals
and they burned incense to images.
So why is one phrase incorrectly referenced a prophecy, but not the rest of the phrase about sacrificing to Baals and burning incense to images?

Dumb.

"Matthew" was high.
 
Upvote 0

Offline4Better.

Christian
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,384
7,707
✟668,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Naw. All you did is preach.
Agreed. As a Christian, it bugs me when someone decides to preach in the wrong situation. It makes Christians look bad. @Kokavkrystallos could have gone about this in a different way, and posted in a different subforum. His OP has nothing to do with ethics and morality, based upon the SOP.


Based on the Ethics & Morality forum Statement of Purpose (SOP) guidelines, here are seven reasons why Kokavkrystallos' post may be considered a rule breaker:

1. Promotion of a specific belief system: The post advocates for believing in God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit as the only way to be saved and avoid hell. This goes against the subforum's guideline that discussions on ethics and morality may not be used to promote a specific belief system or religion.
2. Disregard for handling disagreements: The post includes the statement "Do not debate with the LORD, for you shall lose!" which discourages respectful dialogue and disagreement among forum members. This contradicts the subforum's guideline that members should address the content of posts rather than attacking the poster, and engage in respectful discourse even during disagreements.
3. Homiletic tone: The post is written in a preaching or sermon-like style, which may not be suitable for a forum designed for discussions on ethics and morality. The tone is overly persuasive and prescriptive rather than inviting open dialogue and respectful discourse.
4. Lack of respect for diverse beliefs: The post implies that atheists, deists, unitarians, agnostics, and others who do not share the same belief system are lost, beneath the wrath of a Holy God, and condemned to hell. His post also mentions the KJV Bible, which not all Christians use. This disregards the forum's guideline that members should treat each other with courtesy and respect at all times, especially during disagreements.
5. Off-topic: The post is primarily about promoting a specific belief system rather than addressing conduct based on ethics and morality as stated in the forum's purpose.
6. Non-compliance with sitewide rules: The post may be considered non-compliant with the sitewide rules, as it could be perceived as promoting a controversial belief system in a subforum meant for all beliefs, and potentially violating the rule against flame or goading.
7. Lack of thread tags: The post does not include any relevant thread tags that enable users to find other threads on similar topics, making it difficult for users to engage in productive discussions and debates.
 
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

rebornfree

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
May 5, 2007
8,776
14,542
NW England
✟966,360.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Divorced
Alcohol is banned in the Kingdom of heaven. But it will not be needed to experience joy and bliss, nor shall there be the associated sickness that often comes to those who get drunk.
Where does it say that? In Matthew 26 v 29 Jesus says "I tell you, never again shall I drink from the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in the Kingdom of my Father." (NEB)

I agree that there will be no alcohol abuse as there will be no sin so nobody should be getting drunk. But many people just have a drink or two and stay sober and that doesn't seem to be forbidden.
 
Upvote 0

Kokavkrystallos

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2024
1,141
645
Farmington
✟55,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Widowed

Note Jesus is careful to say "fruit of the vine" rather than wine in this passage? Yeast is leaven, and leaven in most cases is a type of Sin. The trees along the river with fruits are fresh fruits. You won't have fermentation or decay.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,865
29,543
Pacific Northwest
✟829,605.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Note Jesus is careful to say "fruit of the vine" rather than wine in this passage? Yeast is leaven, and leaven in most cases is a type of Sin. The trees along the river with fruits are fresh fruits. You won't have fermentation or decay.

The context makes it very clear that He's talking about wine. Had, at the Last Supper, Jesus been handing out freshly plucked grapes then this would make sense, but He wasn't.

And when we come together to celebrate the Holy Eucharist/Lord's Supper, we aren't taking and eating grapes, we are receiving wine. Some modern churches may substitute wine with Welch's, but that's a modern innovation that is a result of pasteurization and refrigeration technologies. It was wine at the Last Supper, it has historically always been wine at the Lord's Table, and Jesus is talking about wine when He speaks of not partaking with them again until the Kingdom.

Jesus, here, is pointing forward to the Marriage Supper of the Lamb, as mentioned by St. John in the Apocalypse. Of which the Holy Table of Communion is a foretaste of.

Whenever we gather and partake of the bread and the wine, we partake of the body and blood of Christ, doing so for the remembrance of Him; and we proclaim His death until He comes (says St. Paul). This Holy Supper unites past, present, and future: Here the broken body and shed blood of Christ are found, and we partake of them and the Mystery of His Passion; here there is forgiveness of our sins. He is also risen, glorified, seated at the right hand of the Father, and we are united with Him and seated with Him in heavenly places. And we look forward to the future day of the resurrection, when He returns, in glory, and our bodies are raised up and become like His own body. And the life everlasting which He has, is ours, now by grace through faith as we live in this fallen world and present age; and also as the inheritance of the Age to Come.

At the Last Supper Jesus brings together His passion and death, His resurrection, His reign, and His coming again in glory.

Fermentation isn't decay. Wine is something celebrated in Scripture, not for its potential for abuse (of which Scripture warns), but as something that celebrates life and the fullness and abundance of life. The abuse of wine is, like so many things, the reality that in this fallen and sinful age of death we sinful people take what are good and wonderful things, and abuse them, and pervert them. But the goodness of these things should not be denied. That we take good and twist it toward evil speaks of our deep inner brokenness; but it is God who takes what is broken and heals it and makes it good again.

-CryptoLUtheran
 
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
31,029
22,727
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟605,053.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Reactions: rebornfree
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,501
4,846
82
Goldsboro NC
✟276,659.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Note Jesus is careful to say "fruit of the vine" rather than wine in this passage? Yeast is leaven, and leaven in most cases is a type of Sin. The trees along the river with fruits are fresh fruits. You won't have fermentation or decay.
Jesus is careful to echo the traditional Hebrew blessing of wine. That's all it means in that passage.
Barukh attah Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha'olam, borei peri ha'gafen.
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
7,434
5,596
New England
✟284,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Note Jesus is careful to say "fruit of the vine" rather than wine in this passage? Yeast is leaven, and leaven in most cases is a type of Sin. The trees along the river with fruits are fresh fruits. You won't have fermentation or decay.
Since when is leaven sin? I really don’t see God having an absolute morality stance in baking powder and yeast. And trees with fruits do have fermentation and decay, and wild yeast, for that matter.
 
Upvote 0

Kokavkrystallos

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2024
1,141
645
Farmington
✟55,824.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Widowed
Since when is leaven sin? I really don’t see God having an absolute morality stance in baking powder and yeast. And trees with fruits do have fermentation and decay, and wild yeast, for that matter.

Technically eating leavened bread is ok. It does not intoxicate.

Leaven has always been symbolic of sin or corruption: "Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees."
(Matthew 16:6)

In 1 Corinthians 5 written about a man who had his fathers wife, Paul says "
"Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?
Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us:
Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth." (5:6-8)
 
Upvote 0