- Jan 7, 2003
- 41,808
- 19,834
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Unitarian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
This time Devin is suing over an Esquire article detailing how his much-touted dairy farm is actually in Iowa (Steve King's district) and has been for more than a decade even though most puff pieces mention his deep California farm roots (he does, however, own shares in a Napa Valley winery). Apparently this besmirching is worth $75,000,000.
The reporter, Ryan Lizza, seems to mainly have transgressed by detailing how dependent Iowa's dairy farmers (and agriculture in general in this country) are on undocumented labor and the irony of their support for Donald and King. The article is sympathetic to their plight, both the farmers' and the laborers', but there is deep concern that any publicity could bring ICE down upon the town with disastrous consequences for all.
Devin's response is Trumpian in its personal attacks on the reporter. From the FresnoBee
Link to Nunes' Suit (pdf)
Having read the article in question, this suit seems to me like the defamatory hit-piece Devin accuses Lizza of writing.
Esquire said:There’s nothing particularly strange about a congressman’s family moving. But what is strange is that the family has apparently tried to conceal the move from the public—for more than a decade. As far as I could tell, until late August, neither Nunes nor the local California press that covers him had ever publicly mentioned that his family dairy is no longer in Tulare.
The reporter, Ryan Lizza, seems to mainly have transgressed by detailing how dependent Iowa's dairy farmers (and agriculture in general in this country) are on undocumented labor and the irony of their support for Donald and King. The article is sympathetic to their plight, both the farmers' and the laborers', but there is deep concern that any publicity could bring ICE down upon the town with disastrous consequences for all.
Devin's response is Trumpian in its personal attacks on the reporter. From the FresnoBee
FresnoBee said:The complaint does not contest any facts in Lizza’s story, and it is not clear what act Nunes considers to be unlawful.
The complaint accuses Lizza and Hearst of acting as part of a conspiracy to defame Nunes, a charge he has leveled in all four of his previous lawsuits filed this year. It bases that on the spread of the story among journalists in social media.
Nunes in the complaint says Lizza’s story harmed his reputation, another frequent charge in his lawsuits. Nunes refers to the story throughout the complaint as a “hit piece.”
NunesComplaint said:In this case, Plaintiff seeks money damages for the insult, pain, embarrassment, humiliation, mental suffering, anguish, and injury to his good name and professional reputation in Iowa and elsewhere, caused by the Defendants’ defamation. The Defendants published click-bait, sensationalist, egregious misstatements simply to sell magazines and, in Lizza’s case, to distract readers from his negative image and history as a sexual predator and to improve his standing. The Defendants’ had an axe to grind against Plaintiff, and wrote the hit piece in order to accomplish a nefarious purpose. Defendants’ misconduct exemplifies the very worst of modern “journalism”. They should be punished for their unlawful actions and a very strong message needs to be sent to prevent other so-called “journalists” from acting in a similar way.
Link to Nunes' Suit (pdf)
Having read the article in question, this suit seems to me like the defamatory hit-piece Devin accuses Lizza of writing.