Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Nuclear deal with Iran - good or bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LoveBeingAMuslimah" data-source="post: 69697777" data-attributes="member: 323708"><p>Because the administration lied to the public about it. They deleted a portion of a video before posting it online (the part where they confess to lying). It matters because this exposes a total lack of transparency. The narrative they gave to the public was that talks had begun in summer of 2013 when the supposedly "moderate" regime (chosen by Khomeini) was elected when in reality the proposal was finalized well before that time. </p><p></p><p>Maybe read the post before the one you quoted. It contains (long) excerpts from the (even longer) article in the NYT. It shows how the administration spun this deal to win public support. Ben Rhodes himself states that another administration using the same tactics scares him. </p><p></p><p>I don't see how the government lying so blatantly over such a big thing in order to drum up support for the Iran deal (at a time when Iran is supporting terrorism in Syria) is not a problem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LoveBeingAMuslimah, post: 69697777, member: 323708"] Because the administration lied to the public about it. They deleted a portion of a video before posting it online (the part where they confess to lying). It matters because this exposes a total lack of transparency. The narrative they gave to the public was that talks had begun in summer of 2013 when the supposedly "moderate" regime (chosen by Khomeini) was elected when in reality the proposal was finalized well before that time. Maybe read the post before the one you quoted. It contains (long) excerpts from the (even longer) article in the NYT. It shows how the administration spun this deal to win public support. Ben Rhodes himself states that another administration using the same tactics scares him. I don't see how the government lying so blatantly over such a big thing in order to drum up support for the Iran deal (at a time when Iran is supporting terrorism in Syria) is not a problem. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Nuclear deal with Iran - good or bad?
Top
Bottom