Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Nuclear Commission Considers Fewer Inspections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="variant" data-source="post: 74129854" data-attributes="member: 114463"><p>It's an unwise choice regardless. Nuclear reactors are the kind of thing where the cost/benefit of regulation is clear.</p><p></p><p>The pro nuclear reactor argument is harmed most thoroughly and most often by nuclear accidents, so it is in their (and everyone's) best interest that we can trust the system that regulates reactors.</p><p></p><p>It's a better safe than sorry argument and it's a issue where there isn't a lot of trust. So, why should I be OK with building the next generation of nuclear reactors, when I can't be convinced that 40 years from now that everyone involved won't want to decrease vigilance because of a bit of profit margin?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="variant, post: 74129854, member: 114463"] It's an unwise choice regardless. Nuclear reactors are the kind of thing where the cost/benefit of regulation is clear. The pro nuclear reactor argument is harmed most thoroughly and most often by nuclear accidents, so it is in their (and everyone's) best interest that we can trust the system that regulates reactors. It's a better safe than sorry argument and it's a issue where there isn't a lot of trust. So, why should I be OK with building the next generation of nuclear reactors, when I can't be convinced that 40 years from now that everyone involved won't want to decrease vigilance because of a bit of profit margin? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Nuclear Commission Considers Fewer Inspections
Top
Bottom